|
|
| SCO Invites You to Their 2nd Quarter Financial Results Conference Call on June 2 |
 |
|
Monday, May 24 2004 @ 10:40 AM EDT
|
SCO has put out a press release announcing that it is extending an invitation to join its second quarter 2004 financial results conference call on Wednesday, June 2, at 11:00 AM Eastern time. They say you can call 800-289-0518 or 913-981-5532, confirmation code 431766. There will be a listen-only webcast as well at http://ir.sco.com/medialist.crm.
Here is the press release.
*************************************
The SCO Group Extends Invitation to Join Its Second Quarter 2004 Financial Results Conference Call
LINDON, Utah, May 19 /PRNewswire-FirstCall/ -- The SCO(R) Group, Inc.
(Nasdaq: SCOX) will host its second quarter 2004 financial results conference
call on Wednesday, June 2, 2004.
WHAT: The SCO Group, Inc. Second Quarter 2004 Financial Results
Conference Call
WHEN: Wednesday, June 2, 2004, 9:00 a.m. (Mountain Daylight Time), or
11:00 a.m. (Eastern Time).
HOW: If you would like to participate in the live call you may dial
800-289-0518 or 913-981-5532; confirmation code: 431766. You may
also join the call in listen-only mode via Web cast. The URL is
listed at http://ir.sco.com/medialist.cfm.
ABOUT THE SCO GROUP:
The SCO Group (Nasdaq: SCOX) helps millions of customers in more than
82 countries to grow their businesses with UNIX business solutions.
Headquartered in Lindon, Utah, SCO has a worldwide network of more than
11,000 resellers and 4,000 developers. SCO Global Services provides reliable
localized support services to all partners and customers. For more
information on SCO products and services visit http://www.sco.com.
SCO and the associated SCO logo are trademarks or registered trademarks of
The SCO Group, Inc. in the U.S. and other countries. All other brand or
product names are or may be trademarks of their respective owners.
|
|
|
|
| Authored by: Anonymous on Monday, May 24 2004 @ 10:58 AM EDT |
| [ Reply to This | # ]
|
| |
| Authored by: Anonymous on Monday, May 24 2004 @ 10:59 AM EDT |
| [ Reply to This | # ]
|
| |
| Authored by: Anonymous on Monday, May 24 2004 @ 11:07 AM EDT |
In these financial results, we will finally learn how much
EV1 paid for their license.
[ Reply to This | # ]
|
| |
| Authored by: James on Monday, May 24 2004 @ 11:19 AM EDT |
| Man that's my birthday, now they've ruined that too... [ Reply to This | # ]
|
| |
| Authored by: DannyB on Monday, May 24 2004 @ 11:24 AM EDT |
I didn't see the familiar...
..."the owner of the UNIX operating system"....
nonsense in that press release? What's up with that?
---
The price of freedom is eternal litigation.[ Reply to This | # ]
|
| |
| Authored by: hardcode57 on Monday, May 24 2004 @ 11:25 AM EDT |
I have to got to the dentist that day PJ, so please don't write anything that
will make me laugh at them, 'cos it will hurt.[ Reply to This | # ]
|
| |
| Authored by: oo on Monday, May 24 2004 @ 11:36 AM EDT |
Can we get together, coordinate and try to get some questions asked?
I'm not sure how the selection process for questions works, but maybe if there
are more of us trying, one will get through. And if we can previously agree on a
set of good questions that can be asked?
---
m.[ Reply to This | # ]
|
| |
| Authored by: Anonymous on Monday, May 24 2004 @ 11:37 AM EDT |
| That's nice, isn't it - or perhaps - maybe - not. [ Reply to This | # ]
|
| |
| Authored by: rsteinmetz70112 on Monday, May 24 2004 @ 12:10 PM EDT |
I wonder if this is a lame attempt to portray themselves as a victim of the
crazed Linux terrorists?
It seems inevitable that at least a few people may try to disrupt the call, if
only by trying to get answers to some of the more obvious SCO failings.
I hope I'm wrong.
I plan on listening in on the webcast, I'm actually more interested on the tone
of analysts and share holders. [ Reply to This | # ]
|
| |
| Authored by: Anonymous on Monday, May 24 2004 @ 12:27 PM EDT |
"...are or may be trademarks of their respective
owners"
Hmm... "may
be"? I'm going to guess SCOG are no longer
sure just what they own let alone
anyone else.
RS [ Reply to This | # ]
|
- Cute - Authored by: frk3 on Monday, May 24 2004 @ 12:52 PM EDT
- Cute - Authored by: DannyB on Monday, May 24 2004 @ 01:10 PM EDT
| |
| Authored by: frk3 on Monday, May 24 2004 @ 02:52 PM EDT |
I feel so flattered that I was invited.
I mean, to think, I could witness
Darl and other key TSG executives, lie, squirm, twist and obfuscate
personally!
Like I don't get enough of that from their press releases,
interviews and court filings, geesh! [ Reply to This | # ]
|
| |
| Authored by: Anonymous on Monday, May 24 2004 @ 04:12 PM EDT |
It just struck me as funny that SCO here claimed a global network of 4000
developers. When they recently cut their workforce by 10% letting to 25
developers that means they've got about 225 employees at SCO, not all of
which can be developers.
I was just wondering where this mountain of developers came from. They
seem to tout Samba quite highly in UnixWare and OpenServer. Does this
global network of developers include the people behind FOSS projects that
they include in their systems (Samba, Apache, Perl)? I wonder what guys like
Larry Wall feel about being labeled as part of SCO's "global network of
4000
developers".[ Reply to This | # ]
|
| |
| Authored by: Anonymous on Monday, May 24 2004 @ 04:13 PM EDT |
Please ask SCO
1. How strong is their evidence of copying from UNIX System V or UNIXWARE into
Linux?
2. How many lines were copied? How many by IBM?
3. Do SCO know *precisely* where the lines were copied from? UNIX SYSTEM V, or
UNIXWARE, or something else?
4. Does SCO think that this copying is a copyright infringement?
I look forward to reading SCO's June 2004 answers on these.
[ Reply to This | # ]
|
| |
| Authored by: tangomike on Monday, May 24 2004 @ 05:27 PM EDT |
someone askes for comments on where TSCOG is headed or does Mr. Blepp's
statement about only revealing bits of evidence at a time still reflect the SCO
strategy.
---
To The SCO Group - please come back when you pass a Turing test.
[ Reply to This | # ]
|
| |
| Authored by: MikeA on Monday, May 24 2004 @ 11:49 PM EDT |
| "SCO and the associated SCO logo are trademarks or registered trademarks of
The SCO Group, Inc. in the U.S. and other countries."
;)
"All
other brand or product names are or may be trademarks of their respective
owners."
That last sentence is interesting...don't remember seeing it
before in their material....hmmmmm.
---
Change is merely the
opportunity for improvement. [ Reply to This | # ]
|
| |
| Authored by: blacklight on Tuesday, May 25 2004 @ 06:01 AM EDT |
I expect SCOG to say that their "licensing" program is going according
to plan, that they will prevail in all of their lawsuits and that their stock is
undervalued and thus an extremely good bargain - my comment at this point is
that their current price of $4.80 represents a capitalization of $70 mil, whis
in in turn $20 mil above their cash reserve. If they show a losing quarter, then
their stock could go down to $3.40 (or 5/7 of $70 mil) which means that the only
thing holding up their stock will be their cash reserve.
SCOG would be well advised to make sure that its ducks are lined up in a row, so
far as its SEC filings are concerned. I will definitely be interested in the
Darl's tone: is it buoyant, grandiose, bombastic, confrontational, etc.? I would
twist the knife in the wound and ask the Darl when, not if, the Darl intends to
follow through his commitment to sue 10 to 15 more corporate users.[ Reply to This | # ]
|
| |
| Authored by: Anonymous on Tuesday, May 25 2004 @ 09:12 AM EDT |
| Who's gonna make a beer run? [ Reply to This | # ]
|
|
|
|
|
