decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


You won't find me on Facebook


Donate

Donate Paypal


No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
SCO's Shareholder Rights Plan, et al
Friday, September 03 2004 @ 06:51 AM EDT

Here is SCO's Shareholder Rights Plan. As you can see, the worrisome figure to SCO is 15%. While they say this plan has nothing to do with any takeover attempt, one can't help but notice that BayStar now appears to own 12.7%. (Exhibit 1.)As you know, I'm no financial maven, but even I can add 1 and 1. UPDATE: I have heard from a corporate lawyer who points out that, in fairness, it should be said that 15% is a normal figure for such poison pill plans.

Here is the setup on the new Series A Junior Participating Preferred Stock, whereby each share gives you 1,000 votes, according to Section 3(a): "Subject to the provision for adjustment hereinafter set forth, each share of Series A Preferred Stock shall entitle the holder thereof to 1,000 votes on all matters submitted to a vote of the stockholders of the Corporation." That is in addition to their normal votes resuting from their shares of common stock. And the poison pill section seems to say that in the event SCO gets bought, dissolved or whatever, these dudes holding Series A Junior Preferred Stock get 1,000 times the loot they otherwise would have:

Section 6.               Liquidation, Dissolution or Winding Up.

  (a)           Upon any liquidation, dissolution or winding up of the Corporation, no distribution shall be made (i) to the holders of shares of stock ranking junior (either as to dividends or upon liquidation, dissolution or winding up) to the Series A Preferred Stock unless, prior thereto, the holders of shares of Series A Preferred Stock shall have received the greater of (x) $1,000 per share, plus an amount equal to accrued and unpaid dividends and distributions thereon to the date of such payment (the “Series A Liquidation Preference”) and (y) an aggregate amount per share, subject to the provision for adjustment hereinafter set forth, equal to the product of 1,000 times the aggregate amount to be distributed per share to holders of shares of Common Stock, or (ii) to the holders of shares of stock ranking on a parity (either as to dividends or upon liquidation, dissolution or winding up) with the Series A Preferred Stock, except distributions made ratably on the Series A Preferred Stock and all such parity stock in proportion to the total amounts to which the holders of all such shares are entitled upon such liquidation, dissolution or winding up.  In the event the Corporation shall, at any time after the Rights Dividend Declaration Date declare or pay any dividend on the Common Stock payable in shares of Common Stock, or effect a subdivision or combination or consolidation of the outstanding shares of Common Stock (by reclassification or otherwise than by payment of a dividend in shares of Common Stock) into a greater or lesser number of shares of Common Stock (and an equivalent dividend is not declared on the Series A Preferred Stock or the Series A Preferred Stock is not similarly subdivided or combined), then in each such case the aggregate amount to which holders of shares of Series A Preferred Stock were entitled immediately prior to such event under the proviso in clause (i) of the preceding sentence shall be adjusted by multiplying such amount by a fraction the numerator of which is the number of shares of Common Stock outstanding immediately after such event and the denominator of which is the number of shares of Common Stock that were outstanding immediately prior to such event.

  (b)           In the event, however, that there are not sufficient assets available to permit payment in full of the Series A Liquidation Preference and the liquidation preferences of all other series of Preferred Stock, if any, which rank on a parity with the Series A Preferred Stock, then such remaining assets shall be distributed ratably to the holders of Series A Preferred Stock and such parity shares in proportion to their respective liquidation preferences.

  Section 7.               Consolidation, Merger, etc. 

In case the Corporation shall enter into any consolidation, merger, combination or other transaction in which the shares of Common Stock are exchanged for or converted or changed into other stock or securities, cash and/or any other property (or into the right to receive any of the foregoing), then in any such case each share of Series A Preferred Stock shall at the same time be similarly exchanged, converted or changed into an amount per share, subject to the provision for adjustment hereinafter set forth, equal to 1,000 times the aggregate amount of stock, securities, cash and/or any other property (payable in kind), as the case may be, into which or for which each share of Common Stock is converted, changed or exchanged.  In the event the Corporation shall, at any time after the Rights Dividend Declaration Date declare or pay any dividend on the Common Stock payable in shares of Common Stock, or effect a subdivision or combination or consolidation of the outstanding shares of Common Stock (by reclassification or otherwise than by payment of a dividend in shares of Common Stock) into a greater or lesser number of shares of Common Stock (and an equivalent dividend is not declared on the Series A Preferred Stock or the Series A Preferred Stock is not similarly subdivided or combined), then in each such case the amount set forth in the preceding sentence with respect to the conversion, exchange or change of shares of Series A Preferred Stock shall be adjusted by multiplying such amount by a fraction, the numerator of which is the number of shares of Common Stock outstanding immediately after such event and the denominator of which is the number of shares of Common Stock that were outstanding immediately prior to such event.

So when they say they intend to take care of the shareholders, they left out which shareholders they mean to take care of. As usual, the little people get... well, how to put it? Overlooked? More eye-glazing details in this document, the Rights Agreement between SCO and ComputerShare Trust Company, the rights agent. It's probably fascinating stuff, if you are Canopy Group or an executive at SCO, but I confess I find it slow going. I'll finish slogging through it later, having no personal stake in the fine points. I'm sure, though, that if I ever wanted to be slick and was a public company, I'd hide my slime in a document just like this. Obfuscated. Not saying anyone has, of course, in this particular document. Just saying in general, that's what I'd do, because no one can bear to read this stuff.

Speaking of SEC filings, here is Microsoft's. It seems Linux is a serious competitor after all:

We continue to watch the evolution of open source software development and distribution, and continue to differentiate our products from competitive products including those based on open source software. We believe that Microsoft's share of server units grew modestly in fiscal 2004, while Linux distributions rose slightly faster on an absolute basis. The increase in Linux distributions reflects some significant public announcements of support and adoption of open source software in both the server and desktop markets in the last year. To the extent open source software products gain increasing market acceptance, sales of our products may decline, which could result in a reduction in our revenue and operating margins. . . .

For fiscal 2004, the operating income decline of $511 million was primarily caused by the $2.53 billion of charges related to the Sun Microsystems settlement and a fine imposed by the European Commission in the third quarter of fiscal 2004 and $2.21 billion of stock-based compensation expense related to our employee stock option transfer program in the second quarter of fiscal 2004. . . .

In fiscal 2005, we do not expect revenue to grow at similarly high rates as fiscal 2004, even if information technology spending continues to improve. While we expect general economic conditions to remain stable with the improvements seen in the second half of fiscal 2004, we expect PC and server unit shipment growth rates to decline in fiscal 2005 from the high growth rates in fiscal 2004.

Here[PDF] is a handy chart from the Center for Strategic and International Studies, showing what all the countries in the world are doing or not doing with respect to FOSS. Heise, according to my computer translation, finds lots of reasons for MS to worry:

"The US-American center for Strategic and internationally Studies (CSIS) gathered world-wide 90 initiatives and projects current in authorities and other national places for the application of open SOURCE (pdf). The researchers are encountered thereby 24 urgent recommendations for the application of open SOURCE. None of these decisions was transferred however so far in the long run, is called it in the study. It gives so far also no official decision, which forbids the application of proprietaerer software.

[German] "Das US-amerikanische Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS) hat weltweit 90 in Behörden und anderen staatlichen Stellen laufende Initiativen und Projekte zum Einsatz von Open Source zusammengetragen (PDF). Die Forscher sind dabei auf 24 dringende Empfehlungen für den Einsatz von Open Source gestoßen. Keine dieser Entscheidungen sei aber bisher letzlich umgesetzt worden, heißt es in der Studie. Es gebe bisher auch keine behördliche Entscheidung, die den Einsatz proprietärer Software verbietet."

And now for the text of the SCO shareholder rights plan:

************************

Material Modifications, Change in FYE or Articles, Financial Statements and Exhibit

Item 3.03. Material Modification to Rights of Security Holders.

On August 10, 2004, the Board of Directors of the The SCO Group, Inc. (the "Company") adopted a stockholder rights plan (the "Rights Plan"). The plan is similar to plans adopted by many other companies and was not adopted in response to any current hostile takeover attempt. In connection with adopting the Rights Plan, the Company created a new Series A Junior Participating Preferred Stock (the "Series A Preferred Stock") on August 27, 2004 having the rights and preferences set forth in Exhibit 4.1 hereto.

Under the Rights Plan, Series A Preferred Stock purchase rights (the "Rights") will be distributed as a dividend at the rate of one Right for each share of common stock of the Company held by stockholders of record as of the close of business on August 30, 2004. The Rights Plan is designed to deter coercive takeover tactics, including the accumulation of shares in the open market or through private transactions and to prevent an acquiror from gaining control of the Company without offering a fair price to all of the Company's stockholders. The Rights will expire on August 10, 2014.

Each Right will entitle stockholders to buy one unit of a share of Series A Preferred Stock at a price of $60. The Rights generally will be exercisable only if a person or group acquires beneficial ownership of 15% or more of the Company's common stock or commences, or publicly announces an intention to commence, a tender or exchange offer upon consummation of which such person or group would beneficially own 15% or more of the Company's common stock, and thus becomes an "Acquiring Person."

If any person becomes the beneficial owner of 15% or more of the Company's common stock, other than pursuant to a board-approved tender or exchange offer for all the outstanding shares of the Company, then each Right not owned by an Acquiring Person will entitle its holder to purchase, at the Right's then current exercise price, shares of Series A Preferred Stock (or, in certain circumstances as determined by the board, cash, property, or other securities) having a value of twice the Right's then current exercise price. In addition, if the Company, after any person has become an Acquiring Person, becomes involved in a merger or other business combination transaction with another company, in which the Company does not survive or in which its common stock is changed or exchanged, or sells 50% or more of its assets or earning power to another person, each Right will entitle each holder, other than an Acquiring Person, to purchase shares of common stock at the Right's then current exercise price of such other company.

The Company will be entitled to redeem the Rights at $0.001 per Right at any time until 10 days (subject to extension) after a public announcement that any person or group of affiliated persons intends to acquire, or has acquired or obtained the right to acquire, beneficial ownership of 15% or more of the shares of the Company's common stock.

The Rights are intended to enable all stockholders to realize the long-term value of their investment in the Company. The Rights will not prevent a takeover attempt, but should encourage anyone seeking to acquire the Company to negotiate directly with the board of directors.

Item 5.03. Amendments to Certificate of Incorporation or Bylaws; Change in Fiscal Year.

On August 10, 2004, the Board of Directors of the Company adopted the Rights Plan as described more fully above under "Item 3.03 Material Modification to Rights of Security Holders." In connection with the Rights Plan, the Company filed with the Delaware Secretary of State the Certificate of Designation of Series A Junior Participating Preferred Stock, attached hereto as Exhibit 4.1, on August 27, 2004. The Company subsequently filed with the Delaware Secretary of State a Certificate of Correction correcting the Certificate of Designation of Series A Junior Participating Preferred Stock, attached hereto as Exhibit 4.2, on August 31, 2004.

Item 9.01. Financial Statements and Exhibits.

(c) Exhibits. The following items are filed as exhibits to this report:

4.1 Certificate of Designation of Series A Junior Participating Preferred Stock.

4.2 Certificate of Correction correcting the Certificate of Designation of Series A Junior Participating Preferred Stock.

4.3 Rights Agreement dated as of August 10, 2004 by and between the Company and Computershare Trust Company, Inc.


  


SCO's Shareholder Rights Plan, et al | 126 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
Off topic here
Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, September 03 2004 @ 03:16 PM EDT
:-)

[ Reply to This | # ]

SCO's Shareholder Rights Plan, et al
Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, September 03 2004 @ 03:17 PM EDT
Now you know why lawyers get paid so much, because without the proper training you'd go crazy trying to read that gibberish ;).

3dinfo@maficstudios.com

[ Reply to This | # ]

Links etc here
Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, September 03 2004 @ 03:18 PM EDT
:-]

[ Reply to This | # ]

SCO's Shareholder Rights Plan, et al
Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, September 03 2004 @ 03:26 PM EDT
"...Preferred Stock get 1,000 times the loot they otherwise would
have" - no, it means the holders get 1000 extra votes for every preferred
share they hold, plus the ususal one share/one vote. These extra votes thereby
make it harder to get shareholder approval if the majority of voters don't like
the deal. The majority of the Series A Preferred stock is held by Canopy.

[ Reply to This | # ]

Rights will expire...
Authored by: seanlynch on Friday, September 03 2004 @ 03:35 PM EDT

"The Rights will expire on August 10, 2014"

That is very wishfull thinking on SCO's part.

Who really believes there will be any SCOX stock to purchase in ten years?

[ Reply to This | # ]

How Shareholder Rights Plans work
Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, September 03 2004 @ 03:37 PM EDT
I work on rights plans for a living. This plan on quick review looks completely
standard.

The 15% trigger is typical for these plans. 15% is the trigger for Delaware's
(SCO's state of incorporation) antitakeover law, and lawyers feel that Delaware
has therefore recognized the 15% ownership level as an appropriate trigger for a
rights plan.

With respect to the preferred stock, it is meant to be a "common stock
equivilent". If each preferred share has 1000 votes, each share of common
stock will only be issued a "right" to buy 1/1000 of a share. In any
event, the preferred stock is not meant to ever be issued. If a "trigger
event" occurs the rights become rights to buy common stock at a discount.

In truth, the details of the plan are of little import. No plan has ever been
"triggered". If a hostile takeover were planned, the acquiror would
sue to have the plan redeemed.

The current fasion in hotile takeovers is to launch a tender offer for all
outstanding shares, contingent upon the plan being terminated. The tender offer
is accompanied be a proxy contest to elect a new board.

[ Reply to This | # ]

Hard to take seriously?
Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, September 03 2004 @ 03:43 PM EDT
Is it just me? Am I the only one finding it somewhat hard to take this thing
seriously.

From memory:

Canopy holds ~ 40% of the stock

Other Insiders/management etc hold ~ 5% of the stock


Assuming Canopy/insiders/management don't go along with it, somebody else would
to get over 90% of the rest of the stock (51/(100-40-5))


Of course, the situation would chnage, if Canopy or the insiders were planning
on a massive dilution or to dump off their own stock....

[ Reply to This | # ]

SCOG may also be concerned about the institutionals abandoning
Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, September 03 2004 @ 03:49 PM EDT
especially those institutionals who were suckered by the "Linux
lottery" flim-flam.

[ Reply to This | # ]

Obfuscated C or Perl code can be considerer easy reading...
Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, September 03 2004 @ 04:12 PM EDT
...compared to this concentrated legalese. I understand why it is possible to
hide much in such documents.

[ Reply to This | # ]

They're already fighting over the carcass
Authored by: kawabago on Friday, September 03 2004 @ 04:54 PM EDT
I just hope the most holy IP doesn't survive to keep spinning off law suits as
it drifts into obscurity.

[ Reply to This | # ]

Center for Strategic and International Studies
Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, September 03 2004 @ 05:16 PM EDT
That chart from the Center for Strategic and International Studies is amazingly
detailed. They must have put in a great deal of work to collect so much
information. We should keep CISI in mind as a resource for information on oss.

[ Reply to This | # ]

What if Canopy took over SCO
Authored by: rharvey46 on Friday, September 03 2004 @ 05:43 PM EDT
Since 40% of the stock is owned by Canopy, it appears that Canopy may be the
only 'legitimate' sutor to purchase SCO. It would be very difficult for anybody
else to purchase SCO.

What would be the financial and legal consequences if Canopy would take over SCO
completely (i.e. buy more than 50 % of the stock)? Who would win? Who would
loose?

[ Reply to This | # ]

SEC: BayStar form 3 and SCO form 4
Authored by: jog on Friday, September 03 2004 @ 05:50 PM EDT
Have conflicting "effective" dates?
SCO says Sept/2
BayStar says Aug/24
Was it too late to take the pill?

[ Reply to This | # ]

MS 10k
Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, September 03 2004 @ 05:58 PM EDT
In addition to competing with Linux, notice they are pushing the multi-year
licensing? More sucker lock in.

[ Reply to This | # ]

Reading legal documents!
Authored by: Nick_UK on Friday, September 03 2004 @ 06:00 PM EDT
Pamela, anyone,

What is the procedure to read legal documents.

I code/read code, do regex stuff. Hard to learn, but you
can back engineer as you know the rules and work out only
ONE meaning of what code does (as it only does one thing).

So, for example here, the SCO sections 6 & 7.

How do you even start to read that - and actaully
understand and what they mean. To me (and I have posted
about this before on Groklaw) there is several times in
legal documents each new paragraph seems to contradict the
few previous - or not?

Law truly is an ass.

Nick

[ Reply to This | # ]

It's just the same pump-the-stock game..
Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, September 03 2004 @ 06:22 PM EDT
This is just a new game from SCO to try and push their stock price up.

After the market stopped buying the "Act like we own Linux and sue people,
and they'll may believe us"-game, it's now time for a new one.

This one is "Act like our stock is undervalued, and they'll believe
it"-game. SCO isn't going to face a hostile takeover from anyone. The
entire idea behind them suing in the first place was a desperate attempt at
getting bought-out. Now that they realize noone is going to do that; They might
as well pretend they don't want to be bought out.

SCO's stock is not undervalued. SCO's stock will be undervalued when it is
smaller than their assets, NOT including their pathetic Unix business and no-go
SCOSource.

That's my $.02

[ Reply to This | # ]

Perhaps the goal is to prevent Canopy from selling their shares
Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, September 03 2004 @ 06:32 PM EDT
The only thing the insiders at TSCOG have to worry about is Canopy -- they hold
over 5 million shares. Ralph Yarro is the Chairman of Canopy but does not, if I
recall correctly, own any Canopy shares.

Please correct me if my memory is not accurate.

Canopy is controlled by the Noorda Family Trust. The Trustees are Yarro, Ray
Noorda and his wife.

Ray Noorda stepped down as CEO of Novell in 1984 because of short term memory
loss. It is rumored that, now 20 years later, Ray's memory is about as good as
Ronald Reagans.

Often when a respected elder in a family trust steps down as trustee you will
find he is replaced with a blood relative or a trusted long-term family lawyer.

What Ralph, Darl, and cohorts should be concerned about is the Noorda Family
Trust deciding to wash their hands of this dirty mess they have made of The SCO
Group.

Okay, I'll take my tin foil hat off now.

[ Reply to This | # ]

If SCO is so undervalued ...
Authored by: CyberCFO on Friday, September 03 2004 @ 06:44 PM EDT
Why don't the Insiders just take it private? If it is such a good investment,
and the chance of payoff was so great, I would think Yarrow and McBride would be
tripping over each other trying to buy up as much stock as possible. In fact if
they just took it completely private, they wouldn't have to share their
"sure thing" settlement with anybody.

[ Reply to This | # ]

Does all this not mean SCO are boned?
Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, September 03 2004 @ 06:52 PM EDT
It occurs to me that no company which beleives everything it's saying would be
enacting such a thing as this.

I'm given to beleive that SCO expected to be bought out when their share price
was really high, and this is meant to give them time to raise the share price
again so the central 'cadre' of people (Mcbride et al) get at least some of the
cash they were hoping for.
Am I wrong?

[ Reply to This | # ]

SCO's Shareholder Rights Plan, et al
Authored by: prong on Friday, September 03 2004 @ 07:49 PM EDT
I've already noted a couple of rational responses to this posting, so I'm not going to go into a whole lot of detail replying here. If I get an itch this weekend, or if there seems to be a enough interest, I'll send PJ something with more detail.

With apologies to PJ, this type of article drives me a little bonkers. Having read Groklaw, articles and comments, since the folks over at OSDN posted links to it (which I believe means March or April, 2003 at the latest), I know full well there are a number of regular, non-anonymous posters with experience in equities and corporate governance who could have vetted this particular post a bit so it doesn't sound like paranoid partisanship. A little more info and analysis would have gone a long way here.

To the point: is SCO worried about Baystar? Possibly, but I doubt very seriously that they're worried about a Baystar led takeover. The percentage figures for the poison pill provisions are more likely to be coincidental with Baystar's ownership stake. The key thing to remember is that Baystar is a boutique operation, and their specialty isn't buyouts.

Regards,
-prong

[ Reply to This | # ]

Maybe they really are worried about a takeover attempt
Authored by: jfw25 on Friday, September 03 2004 @ 09:48 PM EDT
Or possibly a defection of one of the members of the Canopy group.

SCOX's market capitalization today was about $60 million. They have $43 million in cash (with $8 million possibly already spent, or possibly not already spent). That values the continued existence of SCO (as of today) at around $25 million (i.e. if you bought the whole company and just pocketed the cash, that's how much you'd be paying, net, for SCO's business). It's just possible that a fire sale of SCO's assets might net that much. It's also possible that SCOX's stock price could drop like a rock at the first hint of bad news; if, say, IBM wins everything they've asked for at the September 15 hearing and the stock price drops $1.33 from today's value (an extreme and unlikely event and a reaction chosen solely to make the math work out, granted), then SCO's market capitalization would be roughly equal to the cash pile. At that point, you could (in theory) buy the whole company, tell the lawyers to settle it NOW for as little expense as possible, take the cash, hold a fire sale, and make a modest profit. And given that 49% of SCO is held by institutions, a shareholder who took the initiative to suggest that could get a lot of support (including possibly some member of the Canopy coalition who suddenly decides that salvaging a couple of million is more important than salvaging friendships with the likes of Darl).

So, instead, they ensure that whoever attempts to trigger the dissolution won't have enough voting rights to ram it through, and wouldn't see a cent if they managed to anyway.

And if they are giving credence to the likelihood of the stock price dropping sharply enough soon enough to make that worth worrying about, well I wonder why that might be?

[ Reply to This | # ]

Deckchairs on the Titanic
Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, September 03 2004 @ 10:29 PM EDT
In my opinion this whole plan is just a distraction for the shareholders
conference call, much like the German stock trading thing was last time. It
created an issue for friendly questioners to ask questions about which were
pointed away from the legal disaster.

It is a bit like rearranging the furniture on the deck of the Titanic - a
completely pointless exercise useful only to give the passengers something to
talk about other than the water temperature in the Northern Atlantic.

[ Reply to This | # ]

SCO's buy out talk
Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, September 03 2004 @ 10:43 PM EDT
I will not repost all the media articles in which Darl talks about the possibility of IBM buying them out. There are quite a few from last year.

But it does seem that SCO have always been rather keen on a buy out...

One interesting aside, if you check BSF's position, the poison pill, may not be in their best interest...

16 August 2002, Morgan Keegan to Darl McBride

SCO enters an agreement with Morgan Keegan to try to raise cash on sell the company.
[1] c. In the event of the sale or acquisition of the Company by a third party, the Company will pay Morgan Keegan a transaction fee (the "Transaction Fee") payable in cash at closing equal to the greater of: (i) two (2) percent of the aggregate consideration (the "Transaction Consideration"), as defined below, paid to the Company and its shareholders or (ii) $250,000 (not including gains, if any, from the Warrant Fee).
13 February 2003, Morgan Keegan to Darl McBride:

The provisions of the Morgan Keegan agreement, are restated, specifically with regard to somebody acquiring SCO.
3. SCO and Morgan Keegan reaffirm the merger and acquisition provisions of the Engagement Letter and agree to the applicability of provision 1(c) regarding the payment of a Transaction Fee equal to 2% in the event of a sale or acquisition of SCO to a large strategic company.
23 February 2003, Boies/Zack to Darl McBride:

If SCO is sold, the Boies' firm, agrees to get 20% of the difference between the sale price and $17.9m (the February market capitalization based on then stock price). For example, if somebody bought out SCO for $100 million, Boies would get ($100m-$17.9m X 20%).

Thus Boies firm has a direct interest in boosting the stock price as much as possible, and selling the company.
The Client agrees to pay a twenty percent (20%) contingency fee in cash proceeds immediately upon the occurrence of recovery in litigation or settlement, including any sale of stock or assets, and the contingency payments shall be made as set forth according to Schedule B.

...

[Schedule B]

..

2. The sale of the stock or assets of SCO during the pendency of litigation or the settlement of litigation and/or related to the dismissal of litigation and for a reasonable time thereafter. The twenty percent (20%) contingency fee in this regard will be equal to twenty percent (20%) in excess of SCO’s market capitalization as reported by NASDAQ on the date of this Agreement, which is $17.9 million. It is therefore agreed that the twenty percent (20%) contingency fee in this regard will be equal to twenty percent (20%) of the gross amount of sale proceeds in excess of $17.9 million. Client specifically agrees that in any transaction involving the sale of the stock or assets of SCO, the Client shall disclose the contingency fee to the purchaser and the liability shall be transferred to the purchaser; or

...

All amounts paid in hourly billing to the law firms, including any Utah firm that may be retained, and unused retainer fees will be deducted from the final contingency amount. In no event, however, will any fees that have been paid be refunded to the Client. In any scenario in which SCO receives stock as part of a settlement or for its stock or assets, the law firms shall receive the payment of the contingency fee in cash, unless the stock used to purchase SCO’s stock or assets is unrestricted and from a Fortune 500 company, in which event the Client and the law firms shall receive the stock simultaneously.

[ Reply to This | # ]

Baystar form 13g filing says nothing about offsetting short
Authored by: Anonymous on Saturday, September 04 2004 @ 07:47 AM EDT

Baystar is still likely short against the box. Although they do control 12.7%
of the vote with their long position, their net beneficial ownership is probably
closer to 5% or less, reflecting their hedge which is to be covered by
offsetting purchases and sales as specified under PIPE safe harbor provisions.

[ Reply to This | # ]

SCO's Shareholder Rights Plan, et al
Authored by: gtall on Monday, September 06 2004 @ 09:15 AM EDT
I hate to be fair to M$ but their mention of Linux in their filing may be
entirely self-serving rather than throwing the Linux community a bone. By making
out Linux to be a threat they can:

1. lay the groundwork for getting out of any monopoly dongles the Justice dept.
has on them, "See, there's competition right here, we seen it!";

2. make any future poor performance look attributable to Linux
"stealing" their business rather than their own ineptitude at
producing quality software.

3. be merely a convenience to sweep poor performance under the rug because Linux
as a threat is now believable.

Linux is not yet big enough to hurt M$ except on servers. We can hope that the
desktop will be their Waterloo, but as long as they have the major machine
makers by the throat, Joe Sixpack can only buy what is offered and he doesn't
have enough experience or the will to change out M$ Maleware with Linux.

In some sense, Linux is at a disadvantage from the low expectations of most
users. They want something that works out of the box with no setup. M$ provides
this along with all the problems that brings, i.e., open ports, interconnection
of apps, etc. For Linux to succeed on the desktop, it needs an internal program
interaction model and a network scheme that can compete with M$'s AND be enough
of a standard that app writers will write to it. When Joe Sixpack cannot cut and
paste between apps with the expected results, he just knows it doesn't work.
When he gets infected with a virus, he doesn't blame M$. He might not even know
he's infected and if the infection doesn't stop him from doing what he wants, he
doesn't care.

I recently had the misfortune of attempting to explain the wonders of tabbed
browsing to someone of reasonable M$ user land skills. His response was he
already had tabbed browsing with IE. His explanation was the tabs were in the
task bar at the bottom of the page. Well, gee, they certainly do look like tabs
and any explanation of their difference just wasn't something he could care
about.

FOSS, in general, needs to beat M$, not be good enough. It must start providing
a leadership direction in interface design and app creativity. If it doesn't, it
will always be dependent on picking up M$ scraps. Munich is an M$ scrap, it was
there only because of M$'s mistakes at malware and lockin proprietary dongles.
It was only a win for FOSS in the sense that Linux didn't have these defects.
It was not a win for FOSS in the sense that it contains creative work that does
not exist in M$ land or that has put M$ in the role of playing catch up. When M$
is put in that latter role, then FOSS will have succeeded.

Gerry

[ Reply to This | # ]

Microsoft's "plan" to compete w/FOSS
Authored by: glarepate on Monday, September 06 2004 @ 10:55 AM EDT
>>We continue to watch the evolution of open source software development
and distribution, and continue to differentiate our products from competitive
products including those based on open source software.<<

This would explain why XP still has so many critical security holes left in it
after the application of SP2 then? They are differentiating themselves from
F/OSS?

I say they would be further ahead to conform to sound practices rather than
continue to provide defective products in the name of market share and continued
support and update related income. That's where and why they are losing out,
IMO.

[ Reply to This | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )