decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


You won't find me on Facebook


Donate

Donate Paypal


No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
Declaration of Kellie Carlton and '95 Minutes of the Novell Board - as text
Tuesday, November 30 2004 @ 03:54 AM EST

Here is the Declaration of Kellie Carlton as text, offered in support of Novell's Motion to Dismiss. Our thanks to Janne Kalliomäki, who did the transcribing for us.

It is Ms. Carlton's job to maintain the corporate records of the meeting minutes of Novell's Board of Directors. Exhibit A, attached to her Declaration, is a copy of the September 18, 1995 Minutes of the Meeting of the Board of Directors of Novell, Inc., with one paragraph highlighted for emphasis.

The minutes describe the sale to SCO as "the sale of a portion of Novell's UNIXWare business to SCO", "Novell's sale of its UNIXWare binary business to SCO", and states "Novell will retain all of its patents, copyrights and trademarks (except for the trademarks UNIX and UnixWare), a royalty-free, perpetual, worldwide license back to UNIX and UnixWare for internal use and resale in bundled products, Tuxedo and other miscellaneous, unrelated technology." That last is highlighted in a blue box. Judges appreciate having things highlighted or cited precisely, as it makes their jobs easier. Ours too.

I also note that the minutes make reference to "the new merged product", which you will recall Novell's attorney, Michael Jacobs, mentioned to Judge Kimball at the last hearing was the main point of the deal from Novell's standpoint, and he says that the opportunity to develop this merged product is what SCO got from the deal:

"What did they get? Well, what they get, if you go ahead to 4.18, is a provision that says development of a merged product. And it says in the second sentence:

Buyer is going to commercial use with commercially reasonable efforts to complete the merged product.

[4.18 Development of Merged Product. Following the Closing, Buyer shall diligently and vigorously market, sell and promote the Business. In addition, Buyer shall use its commercially reasonable efforts to complete the Merged Product (as such term is defined in the proposed Operating Agreement) by a date not later than December 31, 1997 to be agreed upon by Buyer and Seller. Buyer shall be entitled to modify the specifications of the Merged Product provided that any modification is previously reviewed by the Architecture Board described in Section 3(a) of the proposed Operating Agreement, and (i) does not impact upon the anticipated migration of Seller's Product to the White Box Product (as such term is defined in the proposed Operating Agreement). Notwithstanding the foregoing without the prior written approval of the Architecture Board, Buyer shall not change the specifications of the Merged Product such that the Merged Product will not include the "NetWare Services" specification set forth on Exhibit A of the proposed Operating Agreement.]

"The merged product was basically what this deal was about from Novell's standpoint. What SCO was going to do was enhance some additional kinds of UNIX, some additional UNIX flavors for special kinds of processors or non-special processors, but evolve the UNIX business, evolve UnixWare in particular, and that's the reference there to the merged product."

You will find it interesting to review his point-by-point explanation of the terms, now that we have the minutes of the Board to compare it with. To me, it's a perfect match, and the Board minutes show that he wasn't reaching for an explanation out of the air.

*******************

MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP
Michael A. Jacobs (pro hac vice)
David E. Melaugh (pro hac vice)
Maame A.F. Ewusi-Mensah (pro hac vice)
[address, phone, fax]

ANDERSON & KARRENBERG
Thomas R. Karrenberg, #3726
John P. Mullen, #4097
Heather M. Sneddon, #9520
[address, phone, fax]

Attorneys for Defendant Novell, Inc.

_________________________

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF UTAH, CENTRAL DIVISION

__________________________

THE SCO GROUP, INC., a Delaware
corporation,

Plaintiff,

vs.

NOVELL, INC., a Delaware Corporation,

Defendant.

__________________________

DECLARATION OF KELLIE
CARLTON IN SUPPORT OF
NOVELL, INC.'S MOTION TO
DISMISS

Case No. 2:04CV00139

Judge Dale A. Kimball

__________________________

Kellie Carlton, under penalty of perjury, declares the following:

1. I am responsible for maintaining the records of the meeting minutes of Novell's Board of Directors. I submit this declaration in support of Novell's Motion to Dismiss. The statements made herein are based on my personal knowledge and investigation.

2. Attached as Exhibit A is a true and correct copy of the September 18, 1995 Minutes of the Meeting of the Board of Directors of Novell, Inc. A blue box has been added on page 2 to identify the text referenced in Novell's motion papers.

I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States that the foregoing is true and correct.

Executed on this _(5)_ day of November, 2004 in _(Provo, Utah)_.

_[signature]_
Kellie Carlton


CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I HEREBY CERTIFY that on this _8th_ day of November, 2004, I caused a true and correct copy of the foregoing DECLARATION OF KELLIE CARLTON IN SUPPORT OF NOVELL, INC.'S MOTION TO DISMISS to be served via first class mail, postage prepaid, to the following:

Brent O. Hatch
Mark F. James
Mark R. Clements
HATCH JAMES & DODGE, P.C.
(address)

Stephen N. Zack
Mark J. Heise
BOIES, SCHILLER & FLEXNER LLP
(address)

Robert Silver
BOIES, SCHILLER & FLEXNER LLP
(address)

_[signature]_


MINUTES OF THE MEETING
OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
OF NOVELL, INC.
MONDAY, SEPTEMBER 18, 1995

A meeting of the Novell, Inc. Board of Directors was held on Monday, September 18, 1995 commencing at noon Mountain Time. The meeting was held pursuant to a telephone conference call. Seven of the eight Directors were present for the meeting namely: Bob Frankenberg, Jack Messman, Elaine Bond, Larry Sonsini, Alan Ashton, Ian Wilson and John Young. Also present by invitation were David Bradford, Ty Mattingly, and Jeff Turner of Novell.

Mr. Frankenberg chaired the meeting and David Bradford served as secretary for the meeting.

PROPOSED SALE OF UNIXWARE BUSINESS
AND EQUITY INVESTMENT IN SCO

Mr. Bradford and Mr. Frankenberg first confirmed that the Directors present on the call had received the materials regarding several proposed transactions.

Mr. Frankenberg then provided an overview of several business transactions the Company was negotiating with Santa Cruz Operation, Inc. (SCO) and Hewlett-Packard for the purpose of strengthening UNIX on the Intel Platform. He described one of the key steps in this process as the sale of a portion of Novell's UNIXWare business to SCO. He then described a proposed structure under which Hewlett-Packard would take a leadership position in the development of 64-bit UNIX technology and, under which, Hewlett-Packard would license Novell networking services as a core component of future 64-bit UNIX.

Mr. Frankenberg next described changes in the current competitive landscape which prompted these transactions. Ty Mattingly next outlined the financial impact of Novell's sale of its UNIXWare binary business to SCO. He discussed the impact on employees of Novell's Florham Park facility and the plans to transition a portion of this headcount to SCO and Hewlett-Packard. He then described the shares of SCO stock Novell would be getting in exchange for its UNIXWare business and the future royalty arrangements.

Various questions were then posed by the Directors concerning: possible analyst reactions; impact on employees; impact on Novell's relationship with Microsoft; the ongoing viability of SCO; the impact on Novell's operating expenses; service on the SCO Board; and due diligence that had been conducted to date. Mr. Frankenberg, Mr. Mattingly, and Mr. Bradford responded to the questions and a discussion ensued.

The Directors next discussed various competetive alternatives and concluded that the transaction as structured was justifiable both from a strategic perspective as well as from a financial one. Mr. Bradford and Mr. Sonsini then reviewed the terms of the Asset Purchase Agreement between SCO and Novell. Both the financial terms of the transaction were reviewed as well as the non-financial terms including issues of Standstill, Registration rights, Board seats, Rights of First Refusal, employee severance, and what happens in the event of a change of control of either SCO or Novell. The Directors asked a variety of questions concerning the contract terms and suggestions were made to improve the terms of royalty collection from SCO.

Then, upon motion duly made, seconded and unanimously carried, the following recitations, and resolutions were adopted:

RESOLVED: That the Board of Directors of this corporation (Novell) hereby determines that it is in the best interests of this corporation and its shareholders to enter into an Asset Purchase Agreement with The Santa Cruz Operation, Inc. (SCO).

Pursuant to the Asset Purchase Agreement, Novell will transfer to SCO its UNIX and UnixWare technology assets, a portion of the employee base in New Jersey (approximately 100 of 400 employees), equipment used in UnixWare business, and certain assumed liabilities thereto. Pursuant to the Asset Purchase Agreement, SCO will issue 6.1 million new shares of common stock to Novell. SCO will also collect and pass through to Novell 95% of the SVRX Royalties. Further, SCO will pay to Novell ongoing royalties associated with their future sale of the UNIXWARE technology as more fully set forth in the Asset Purchase Agreement.

Novell will retain all of its patents, copyrights and trademarks (except for the trademarks UNIX and UnixWare), a royalty-free, perpetual, worldwide license back to UNIX and UnixWare for internal use and resale in bundled products, Tuxedo and other miscellaneous, unrelated technology.

RESOLVED FURTHER: That the following additional terms will be part of the Asset Purchase Agreement between Novell and SCO. Novell will select an individual to be nominated for election to the Board of Directors of SCO. Novell will have the right to maintain its percentage ownership in SCO if SCO issues or sells new shares. Novell will also have a right of first refusal on the sale of SCO to any one of the following companies, or their affiliates, which are: Sun Microsystems; Microsoft, Hewlett-Packard; IBM; Digital; and Fujitsu. Novell will have demand registration rights on SCO shares purchased.

However, Novell will bear the costs of employee severance and will contribute 50% of direct Eiger development cost until such contribution reaches an aggregate of $2.5 million. SCO is committed to shipping the new merged product in 1997, and SCO will support Hewlett-Packard's white box version of UNIX.

RESOLVED FURTHER: That the terms and conditions of the Asset Purchase Agreement as set forth therein are hereby approved, subject to such changes and modifications of a non-material nature as the proper officers of Novell may consider appropriate or necessary.

RESOLVED: That the Board of Directors of this corporation (Novell) hereby determines that it is in the best interests of this corporation and its shareholders to enter into a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) with Hewlett-Packard Company (HP). The purpose of the MOU is to set forth the current mutual intent of Novell and HP regarding the following: HP handling the development of the 64-bit UNIX and giving the source code to SCO in two years for a shrink-wrapped version; and HP receiving license fees for the 64-bit UNIX once Novell's System V licenses its NetWare Directory Services (NDS) and MiddleWare to HP and SCO.

AMERICA ON LINE BOARD MEMBERSHIP

Mr. Frankenberg then outlined a proposal he received from Steve Case and Alexander Haig from America On Line to join their Board of Directors. Mr. Frankenberg reviewed the pros and cons of such service with the members of the Board. A discussion ensued. It was concluded that Mr. Frankenberg's service on the America On Line Board would have a net positive affect on Novell.

STOCK OPTION GRANT

The Board then considered the grant of stock options to various Novell employees. Then, upon motion duly made, seconded, and unanimously carried, the following resolutions were adopted:

RESOLVED: That Novell, Inc. grant to the employees listed on Exhibit "A" non-qualified stock options of _(470,100)_ shares vesting 25 percent after one year and vesting quarterly thereafter at the rate of 6.25 percent per quarter at an option price of $19.00 per share representing the closing price of the stock as of the last trading date (September 15, 1995) before the date of the Board Meeting; the term of said option is to be 10 years. With all of said options to be issued in accordance with the Novell, Inc. 1991 Stock Plan as amended.

ADJOURNMENT

There being no further business to come before the Board, the meeting was declared adjourned by Mr. Frankenberg at 1:30 Mountain Time.

Signed: _(signature)_
David R. Bradford - Secretary


  


Declaration of Kellie Carlton and '95 Minutes of the Novell Board - as text | 146 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
Corrections here please
Authored by: CnocNaGortini on Tuesday, November 30 2004 @ 04:06 AM EST
As usual

[ Reply to This | # ]

OT here please
Authored by: CnocNaGortini on Tuesday, November 30 2004 @ 04:08 AM EST
Odds and ends collection!

[ Reply to This | # ]

Tuxedo (not Tux)
Authored by: CnocNaGortini on Tuesday, November 30 2004 @ 04:12 AM EST

I had been about to ask what Novell's Tuxedo is (wondering whether it might be connected with Tux) but looked it up with Google, and found it in a Novell press release, and I'll paste it here in case others are wondering:

Novell's TUXEDO system provides an architecture for implementing mission-critical business applications in distributed, client/server environments. TUXEDO is the market leading transaction processing environment which provides secure, cost-effective, high performance electronic commerce for use in industries such as banking, telecommunications, finance and retail.

So, nothing specifically to do with Linux.

[ Reply to This | # ]

->"worldwide license back to UNIX and UnixWare for internal use and resale in bundled products"
Authored by: Anonymous on Tuesday, November 30 2004 @ 07:39 AM EST
RE: "worldwide license back to UNIX and UnixWare for internal use and
resale in bundled products"

Sounds like Novell can use any UNIX file that they want to use with SuSE Linux?
No? Linux would be a "bundled product"! OR even a BSD version from
Novell would be a "bundled product"!

Indemnification for Novell SuSE Linux is a walk in the park for Novell based on
these terms. Even if Novell just offers indemnification for the
"corporate Novell/SuSE Linux product" (per their website comparision
of products), they would most likely have at least kernel level indemnification
available for the "SuSE 9.2 Professional" product now. SuSE 9.2 pro
has applications that are from all over the map so that may be the reason why
they will not grant indemnification for that distro at this time... as they
don't control the code/stack for everything in that distro...!

Makes sense... but, at the very least, per the fact that Novell retained
patents, copyrights, etc AND rights to use UNIX files for "bundled
products" that I can see a user of SuSE 9.2 Professional (retail) being
protected from any SCOx user threats that evolve from a kernel level UNIX file
level claim!

It would be a marketing coup for Novell should offer a minimal kernel level form
of indemnification protection in writing for SuSE 9.2 Professional! Why?
Because that is what the APA etc says!

AND due to Novell distributing LINUX as a bundled product under the GPL... then,
the GPL wording takes place and one would wonder then if other LINUX distros
would benefit at the kernel level from the fact that the owner of any USL UNIX
patents, copyrights, etc is IN FACT distributing LINUX? Why would this not be
logical given the facts at this point in the readings we see here on Groklaw
(back to the founding of Groklaw)?



[ Reply to This | # ]

Declaration of Kellie Carlton and '95 Minutes of the Novell Board - as text
Authored by: TZak on Tuesday, November 30 2004 @ 08:25 AM EST
>RESOLVED FURTHER: That the terms and conditions of the Asset Purchase
Agreement as set forth therein are hereby approved, subject to such changes and
modifications of a non-material nature as the proper officers of Novell may
consider appropriate or necessary.
>

I thought I'd mention that the Board of Directors was approving the deal here,
and that the negotiators were only given the authority to make changes of a
non-material nature after this point. Therefore, any suggestion by SCO that the
negotiationg team decided to transfer copyrights after this date would seem
extremely silly. Or at least as silly as the rest of their claims.



---
---------------------------------
show me the million lines of code

[ Reply to This | # ]

sale of SCO
Authored by: Paul Shirley on Tuesday, November 30 2004 @ 08:45 AM EST
Novell will also have a right of first refusal on the sale of SCO to any one of the following companies, or their affiliates, which are: Sun Microsystems; Microsoft, Hewlett-Packard; IBM; Digital; and Fujitsu. Novell will have demand registration rights on SCO shares purchased.

Interesting, I don't remember seeing this before (must learn to read faster).

Either this makes the IBM buyout theory much less plausible or it explains the actions taken to push the stock price so high.

I doubt if Darl or Yarro cared whether IBM or Novell bailed them out but the Novell option required an inflated stock value in the absense of a lawsuit.

[ Reply to This | # ]

Declaration of Kellie Carlton and '95 Minutes of the Novell Board - as text
Authored by: blacklight on Tuesday, November 30 2004 @ 11:09 AM EST
One of SCOG's arguments in its pleadings is that Novell's current management was
not in place at the time the APA was negotiated and signed, and that therefore
the current management has no standing to interpret the terms of the APA
correctly. These minutes from the BOD metting on 18 September 1995 do show that
the 1995 BOD slate's understanding of the terms of the APA is pretty much in
sync with Novell's current management's understanding. If there was an award for
being the most stupid company in IT, SCOG and its managemnt would have won that
award two years in a row.

[ Reply to This | # ]

Board amendments to the APA
Authored by: jpvlsmv on Tuesday, November 30 2004 @ 11:13 AM EST
From the board amendments to the APA:
Novell will have the right to maintain its percentage ownership in SCO if SCO issues or sells new shares.
Did Novell dump its ownership in SCO before the Baystar/RBC "preferred shares" deals?

If not, shouldn't Novell be entitled to a percentage of the preferred stock?

--Joe

[ Reply to This | # ]

  • SCO IsNot TSCOG - Authored by: Anonymous on Tuesday, November 30 2004 @ 11:19 AM EST
Unigram issue 557 ( 25-29 Sept. 1995)
Authored by: Anonymous on Tuesday, November 30 2004 @ 01:59 PM EST
This is from the the 25-29 September 1995 (Issue 557) of
the Unigram.X newsletter. The on-line archive of this seems to be off-line, so
I'll include one of the relevent sections.

(c) Copyright 1995 Apt Data News Ltd.
E-mail enquiries: info@unigram.globalnews.com
System admin: George Yiangou
http://apt.usa.globalnews.com/unigram

UG557-05 UNIX: WHO DOES WHAT, WHERE AND WHEN

Santa Cruz Operation Inc, whose reputation as a development
house is not exactly high-toned and caused problems in the
Ace initiative even though DEC was going to do most of the
work, is supposed to take the UnixWare 2.1 (Eiger) code and
tinker with it, merging it with the Unix V3-based SCO
OpenServer Release 5 (Comet) and create a high-volume system
integrated with portable NetWare networking services - in
other words revive the famous SuperNOS. SCO and HP will swap
HP-UXisms and merged OpenServer/UnixWare extensions. It is
expected to release this merged 32-bit Intel product in
1997, precipitously close to the time when power-mad users
will be thinking about the prospective 64-bit Intel-HP chip
and 64-bit software. Volume sales and new applications
created specifically for the merged offering aren't seen in
the transition plan until April 1998. A beta version of the
merged OpenServer-UnixWare stuff, along with a software
migration toolkit, is due next summer. Prior to that, SCO
will enhance existing product lines to include Unix 95
compliance, NetWare file, print and the like. Novell will
license its NetWare Directory Services and other NetWare 4
technologies to SCO in support of the efforts.

Sticking DCE and NDS together

Meanwhile, Novell and HP are supposed to collaborate - with
Novell licensing technologies to HP - to produce a high-
performance implementation of its NetWare Directory Services
(NDS) and File/Print Services for HP-UX. They're also
supposed to integrate the overlapping NDS and DCE
technologies, picking what's popular in each - like the RPC,
Andrew File System and Kerberos security in DCE and the
file/print in NDS - and stick them together. HP will retain
a vanilla DCE for existing users, but privately admits DCE's
CDS directory service is all-but washed-up. The
productisation plans for the DCE-NDS merge are uncertain.
They're talking to IBM about joining it and may expand the
talks to include other DCE merchants. HP notes 70% of its
customers are running NetWare LANs.

Royalty stream

HP's contributions to the ultimate effort are such that it
claimed last week that it would eventually fall heir to what
remains of the Unix royalty stream. This is the way we heard
the deal was constructed but getting three-way confirmation
proved illusive. It is thought these royalties could
currently be worth around $65m-$75m with HP and SCO still
paying the shares. SCO's portion now ceases. Meanwhile, SCO
and HP are apparently also going to take over some of the
roughly 400 Unix people, now headquartered in Florham Park,
New Jersey, that Novell inherited from AT&T.

Dangerous

The Novell-SCO deal is supposed to close by December 1. The
ramifications of these arrangements, which the industry was
still trying to digest as we went to press, are still
unclear. SCO of course is already a direct competitor of
SunSoft Inc the only remaining entity with a Unix-on-Intel
operating system and Solaris x86, already SVRV4, now also
includes SCO compatability, making it more dangerous to SCO.
Most of the applications that run on SCO Unix as it is today
also reportedly run on UnixWare - and there should be few
migration headaches in that regard - but it seems that the
kernel of the merged system they're planning is neither
purely SVR3 or SVR4.2.

Irresistible

It is unclear whether the Intel OEM contingent, companies
like AT&T GIS and Unisys and even UnixWare supporters like
ICL, will fall in meekly like sheep behind the arrangement
or whether - as some of them have suggested - they would
look at it long and hard no matter what face they put on it
publicly. HP recently indicated that it feels its axis with
Intel will prove irresistible to second- and third-tier
Unix-on-Intel players and will draw them within its thrall
in the next six months while at the same time claiming such
an outcome is not strategic to it (UX No 554). It remains to
be seen whether these players will accept an operating
system or even components from such a die-hard competitor.
It also remains to be seen what impact this arrangement has
on RISC companies who appear to be left to their own
devices.

Microsoft - the irony
Sun figures it might get to make a run at some of the
stragglers. At least it figures it can now develop tighter
alliances with Novell on NetWare. The Novell gang never
bothered to brief DEC, the only company with an existing 64-
bit Unix operating system, but DEC suspects the new
coalition could bring new fissures to the fragmented
industry. It also suspects - and it's hard to argue with it
- that it's buddy Microsoft will become a long-term
beneficiary of what's happening here. Doubtless the industry
will find the notion of shrinkwrapped Unix falling to
company where Microsoft has a position ironic to say the
least, although the deal mirrors some aspects of Microsoft's
dumping of Xenix onto SCO in return for a similar stake
almost a decade ago. It is equally ironic that Novell's
weeks of negotiating to dump the Unix patrimony it foolishly
acquired 27 months ago (UX No 440) and then misspent is
passing to an archetypal industry odd couple, staid up-
market IBM wannabe HP and the proletariat SCO, a company HP
has little taste for.

[ Reply to This | # ]

Declaration of Kellie Carlton and '95 Minutes of the Novell Board - as text
Authored by: Anonymous on Tuesday, November 30 2004 @ 03:14 PM EST
Did anyone else notice that the bottom-right part of the footer on the first two
pages has the comment "confidential", whereas the footer of the final
page says "confidential draft".

The implication here is that this is not a continuous document.

Just a small insignificant point, but I thought it was curious non-the-less

keep up the great work groklaw - love the site

[ Reply to This | # ]

Declaration of Kellie Carlton and '95 Minutes of the Novell Board - as text
Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, December 03 2004 @ 06:19 AM EST
Why in their right mind would Novell indemnify me as a company against a lawsuit
that could potentially cost them a hell of a lot of money because I bought a
product from them for $90 and installed it on all my desktops. Wouldn't really
make much sense, espescially considering SUSE is made for home users. I doubt
SCO will start sueing home users....although they do a lot of other stupid
things so who knows.

[ Reply to This | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )