|
Wednesday update |
|
Wednesday, February 14 2007 @ 09:52 AM EST
|
Here is some fresh Pacer harvest: Novell files something under seal and gets another lawyer; IBM gets an extension of time and Jeffrey Leitzinger gets a protective order (pdf) for his Personal Financial Information...
Groklaw has previously reported on the motion and IBM's answer.
For Novell we have the following Pacer entries:
237: **SEALED DOCUMENT** REPLY TO RESPONSE regarding 171 MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment on Novell's Fourth Claim for Relief filed by Defendant Novell, Inc.. (blk) (Entered: 02/13/2007)
238: ORDER granting 234 Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice of Grant L. Kim for Novell, Inc..
Attorneys admitted Pro Hac Vice may download a copy of the District of Utahs local rules from the courts web site at http://www.utd.uscourts.gov. Signed by Judge Dale A. Kimball on 2/13/07. (blk) (Entered: 02/13/2007)
And in the SCO-IBM case we have:
958 - Order [SCO v. IBM 958] Granting SCO's Motion for a Protective
Order Regarding Dr. Jeffrey Leitzingers Personal Financial Information.
Signed February 12, 2007 by Judge Brooke C. Wells.
959: ORDER granting 957 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply re: Objections and Motion to Amend Decision. Replies due by 2/16/2007. Signed by Judge Dale A. Kimball on 2/13/07. (blk) (Entered: 02/13/2007)
|
|
Authored by: BC on Wednesday, February 14 2007 @ 10:04 AM EST |
...go here [ Reply to This | # ]
|
|
Authored by: BC on Wednesday, February 14 2007 @ 10:06 AM EST |
With plenty of clickable links, please [ Reply to This | # ]
|
- OT Thread - Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, February 14 2007 @ 10:34 AM EST
- SCO wants to subpoena PJ, eh? - Authored by: egan on Wednesday, February 14 2007 @ 10:34 AM EST
- SCO wants to subpoena PJ, eh? - Authored by: ralevin on Wednesday, February 14 2007 @ 10:54 AM EST
- what are the rules re subpoena? - Authored by: pgmer6809 on Wednesday, February 14 2007 @ 12:52 PM EST
- SCO wants to subpoena PJ, eh? - Authored by: pdboddy on Wednesday, February 14 2007 @ 01:24 PM EST
- Biased Journalism????? - Authored by: abraxus on Wednesday, February 14 2007 @ 01:46 PM EST
- Of course they can't find her! - Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, February 14 2007 @ 02:55 PM EST
- SCO wants to subpoena PJ, eh? - Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, February 14 2007 @ 03:53 PM EST
- SCO wants to subpoena PJ, eh? - Authored by: tiger99 on Wednesday, February 14 2007 @ 04:44 PM EST
- SCO wants to subpoena PJ, eh? - Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, February 14 2007 @ 09:20 PM EST
- Freedom of the press? - Authored by: GLJason on Thursday, February 15 2007 @ 02:31 PM EST
- Microsoft settles Iowa antitrust case - Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, February 14 2007 @ 10:37 AM EST
- Please everybody download iowaconsumercase - Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, February 14 2007 @ 10:52 AM EST
- Microsoft settles Iowa antitrust case - Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, February 14 2007 @ 10:58 AM EST
- Microsoft settles Iowa antitrust case - Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, February 14 2007 @ 11:30 AM EST
- Comes et al. (Conlin & Associates P.C. Lead Counsel) settles Microsoft antitrust case - Authored by: Aladdin Sane on Wednesday, February 14 2007 @ 01:50 PM EST
- Microsoft trying to hide documents - Authored by: SpaceLifeForm on Wednesday, February 14 2007 @ 02:31 PM EST
- "Restaurant meal helped fuel Microsoft's Iowa settlement deal" - Authored by: Brian S. on Wednesday, February 14 2007 @ 07:10 PM EST
- Forbes:"Iowa Vs. Microsoft: Who Won?" - Authored by: Brian S. on Wednesday, February 14 2007 @ 07:39 PM EST
- Microsoft settles Iowa antitrust case - Authored by: rsteinmetz70112 on Thursday, February 15 2007 @ 12:52 AM EST
- Ahhh, the power of money...! (n/t) - Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, February 15 2007 @ 03:18 AM EST
- This was always going to be settled. - Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, February 15 2007 @ 04:00 AM EST
- Like Monty Python's "Stop the Film" - Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, February 15 2007 @ 09:25 AM EST
- Dan Lyons complements PJ - Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, February 14 2007 @ 10:58 AM EST
- Forbes suggests that Darl may have lied on a company conference call? - Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, February 14 2007 @ 11:09 AM EST
- Vaughan-Nichols has met PJ - Authored by: Prototrm on Wednesday, February 14 2007 @ 11:25 AM EST
- Microsoft settles another one. - Authored by: roadfrisbee on Wednesday, February 14 2007 @ 11:31 AM EST
- Microsoft cries FOUL over Interoperability, Choice and Open XML--IBM vs Mickeysoft-- - Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, February 14 2007 @ 01:13 PM EST
- Microsoft cries FOUL over Interoperability, Choice and Open XML--IBM vs Mickeysoft-- - Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, February 14 2007 @ 02:38 PM EST
- MS' issue is trust! - Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, February 14 2007 @ 04:09 PM EST
- Microsoft cries FOUL over Interoperability, Choice and Open XML--IBM vs Mickeysoft-- - Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, February 14 2007 @ 05:49 PM EST
- MS's real motives? - Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, February 14 2007 @ 11:36 PM EST
- Microsoft cries FOUL over Interoperability, Choice and Open XML--IBM vs Mickeysoft-- - Authored by: Naich on Thursday, February 15 2007 @ 03:34 AM EST
- Microsoft cries FOUL over Interoperability, Choice and Open XML--IBM vs Mickeysoft-- - Authored by: talldad on Thursday, February 15 2007 @ 04:55 AM EST
- OOXML's only use is as a standard for writing save/restore plug-ins for MS Office. - Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, February 15 2007 @ 04:33 PM EST
- RIAA - Reduced rate settlements - Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, February 14 2007 @ 01:23 PM EST
- OT Thread - Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, February 14 2007 @ 02:14 PM EST
- "The Iowa settlement marks the 18th case to come to a resolution. Mississippi's suit is ongoing" - Authored by: Brian S. on Wednesday, February 14 2007 @ 02:32 PM EST
- Microsoft Statement on the US/Canada XP SP2 Windoze Update Trap. - Authored by: Brian S. on Wednesday, February 14 2007 @ 02:45 PM EST
- Music execs criticise DRM systems - Authored by: RogerB on Wednesday, February 14 2007 @ 04:50 PM EST
- Article onMS and ODF - Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, February 14 2007 @ 05:10 PM EST
- OT Thread - From Bloomberg.com - Authored by: Ursus_Orribilus on Wednesday, February 14 2007 @ 05:41 PM EST
- Design flaw in Vista? - Authored by: Brian S. on Wednesday, February 14 2007 @ 05:54 PM EST
- OT: THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v Scooter - A Snow Day Off in DC - Authored by: webster on Wednesday, February 14 2007 @ 06:32 PM EST
- End user victory in obtaining Ricoh laptop camera data - Authored by: Peter Baker on Wednesday, February 14 2007 @ 06:40 PM EST
- "Force10 switches to open source for core switch OS" - Authored by: Brian S. on Wednesday, February 14 2007 @ 08:10 PM EST
- "Another champion for Linux found in China" - Authored by: Brian S. on Wednesday, February 14 2007 @ 08:53 PM EST
- "Yellow Dog Linux v.5.0 To Be Released for Mac Late February" - Authored by: Brian S. on Wednesday, February 14 2007 @ 09:15 PM EST
- "Red Hat joins Microsoft interoperability effort" - Authored by: Brian S. on Wednesday, February 14 2007 @ 11:05 PM EST
- "New vendor group OSA backs open-source integration" - Authored by: Brian S. on Wednesday, February 14 2007 @ 11:37 PM EST
- Its now legal to speak something other than English in Nevada - Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, February 15 2007 @ 07:59 AM EST
- Russian Court Dismisses Microsoft Piracy Case - Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, February 15 2007 @ 08:38 AM EST
- th80 rides to the rescue - Authored by: Brian S. on Thursday, February 15 2007 @ 10:33 AM EST
- US Group want Canada Added to IP axis of evil. - Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, February 15 2007 @ 11:29 AM EST
- M$ sued for two more patent infringements - Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, February 15 2007 @ 12:32 PM EST
- More desktop losses for Microsoft - Authored by: lordshipmayhem on Thursday, February 15 2007 @ 12:48 PM EST
- A thought on PJ anonymity - Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, February 15 2007 @ 03:28 PM EST
- Dvorak: "Attempts to Manipulate Blogosphere Will Always Backfire" - Authored by: Brian S. on Thursday, February 15 2007 @ 03:53 PM EST
- OT Thread - Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, February 15 2007 @ 05:35 PM EST
- Feb. 15, 2007 - "Yes, there is a PJ" - Authored by: Brian S. on Thursday, February 15 2007 @ 05:50 PM EST
|
Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, February 14 2007 @ 10:54 AM EST |
Please everybody download as much as you can
of iowaconsumercase.org before it goes offline.
In the DR-DOS ligation (if I remember well)
the materials went offline a week after
it was settled, by judge order.
Replicating these materials for redundancy
is important to preserve them for posterity.
Analysing every single detail in them will
have us busy for years to come, I anticipate
these materials will be very useful in future
Microsoft attacks.[ Reply to This | # ]
|
|
Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, February 14 2007 @ 10:55 AM EST |
What, no news about SCO going after PJ?
Are we that slanted here?
Is PJ really sick, or just hiding from the legal action?
and one wonders if there really is a PJ anyhow (despite all the claims)[ Reply to This | # ]
|
- The plot writers are working on it. We didn't expect this. ;-) - Authored by: artp on Wednesday, February 14 2007 @ 10:57 AM EST
- Where's the news about the subpeona of PJ??? - Authored by: duratkin on Wednesday, February 14 2007 @ 11:02 AM EST
- May 10, 2005 SJVN - "Oh, and by the way, Pamela Jones really does exist. I've met her." - Authored by: Brian S. on Wednesday, February 14 2007 @ 11:06 AM EST
- Where's the news about the subpeona of PJ??? - Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, February 14 2007 @ 11:16 AM EST
- Where's the news about the subpeona of PJ??? - Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, February 14 2007 @ 11:17 AM EST
- Trolling aside - Authored by: jvx on Wednesday, February 14 2007 @ 11:43 AM EST
- Trolling aside - Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, February 14 2007 @ 01:00 PM EST
- Trolling aside - Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, February 14 2007 @ 02:10 PM EST
- Time for an article on "Motion to quash subpoena," methinks - Authored by: OmniGeek on Wednesday, February 14 2007 @ 11:47 AM EST
- PJ = Really Scarlett Pimpernel - Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, February 14 2007 @ 11:49 AM EST
- SCO and Lyars might be dangerous... - Authored by: pdqlamb on Wednesday, February 14 2007 @ 12:11 PM EST
- Attempt to Prolong Discovery - Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, February 14 2007 @ 12:18 PM EST
- Where's the news about the subpeona of PJ??? - Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, February 14 2007 @ 01:19 PM EST
- What an ignorant move by SCO. Make her a martyr? - Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, February 14 2007 @ 01:54 PM EST
- the *real* truth about PJ and IBM - Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, February 14 2007 @ 02:13 PM EST
- SCO To File Motion for Mistrial - Spoof - Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, February 14 2007 @ 02:35 PM EST
- PJ's style was always consistent - Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, February 15 2007 @ 04:45 AM EST
|
Authored by: jog on Wednesday, February 14 2007 @ 11:41 AM EST |
Jet Capital Management seems to have reached a
reporting threshold.
jog[ Reply to This | # ]
|
|
Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, February 14 2007 @ 11:59 AM EST |
Wouldn't it be appropriate to sign this post "Not-PJ" or something,
and link to PJ's "I'm away" article? Just to make it clear to visitors
who come across this a few years down the road?[ Reply to This | # ]
|
|
Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, February 14 2007 @ 12:11 PM EST |
perfectly well that SCO can make her life a nightmare simply out of spite. It is
the nature of bogus litigation we know so well from this site.
I hope she sends us a postcard from that sunny beach.[ Reply to This | # ]
|
|
Authored by: sunnyfla on Wednesday, February 14 2007 @ 01:25 PM EST |
<tinfoil hat>
Question: If PJ were "dissappeared", is there any way we would know?
Can anyone confirm that, as of this moment, PJ is ok?
</tinfoil hat>[ Reply to This | # ]
|
- She's dead, Jim - Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, February 14 2007 @ 08:21 PM EST
|
Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, February 14 2007 @ 02:03 PM EST |
SCO will never find her.
PJ is hiding under their "Mountains Of Code".[ Reply to This | # ]
|
|
Authored by: karl on Wednesday, February 14 2007 @ 03:01 PM EST |
This is funny. What's SCO's evidence that PJ is a front for IBM lawyers rather
than who she (or he) says she is???
...the quality of the work. They
disbelieve that it's possible for Groklaw to be
so good unless it has funding,
corporate support, etc, therefore it must be a front for IBM.
What is
SCO's evidence that Linux used code stolen from them? Well, none of
course,
but ironically, again, they disbelieve that it's possible for Linux to be
so
good unless it had funding, corporate support, etc, and, therefore, IBM
must
have been responsible for making Linux good enough to compete
against
UNIX.
Fundamentally they disbelieve that anything of high quality can be
produced
unless it's done by a business out to make a profit, even though they
ship
PostgreSQL, gcc, and, in fact, open source software is the backbone of
their
product, particularly since Oracle and others, seeing their miniscule and
declining market
share, ceased to support their products.
On a side note,
Buchanan avoided jail for Watergate because he was "just a
speechwriter". Hi,
Blake. [ Reply to This | # ]
|
|
Authored by: Sean DALY on Wednesday, February 14 2007 @ 03:17 PM EST |
http://www.copiepresse.be
Copiepresse has published the PDF of yesterday's ruling of the Brussels Court of
First Instance which upholds the previous judgement against Google, while
reducing the daily fines to 25,000 EUR.
Margaret Boribon, General Secretary of Copiepresse, stated in our Groklaw
interview that she wanted to negotiate with Google, but they refused to
communicate...
Sean DALY
[ Reply to This | # ]
|
|
Authored by: gbl on Wednesday, February 14 2007 @ 03:19 PM EST |
There is a scene when the Romans have captured the run away slaves. A Roman
officer faces the crowd of sitting slaves and asks, "Who is
Spartacus?"
And one by one, the slaves stand and shout, "I am Spartacus!"
Seems appropriate somehow :-)
---
If you love some code, set it free.[ Reply to This | # ]
|
|
Authored by: BobinAlaska on Wednesday, February 14 2007 @ 04:24 PM EST |
Found this article on Google News.
Clicky --- Bob Helm,
Juneau, Alaska
[ Reply to This | # ]
|
|
Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, February 14 2007 @ 04:48 PM EST |
Its not up to SCO. Its up to the Judge.
Anyone can fight a subpoena and let the judge decide if the burden inflicted
outweighs the relevance of the information sought.
Anyone can walk out of a deposition if one side is actually being too abusive
and then let the judge decide if the discovery line should continue.[ Reply to This | # ]
|
- EFF - Authored by: BobinAlaska on Wednesday, February 14 2007 @ 05:36 PM EST
|
Authored by: fjalvingh on Wednesday, February 14 2007 @ 06:52 PM EST |
What really bothers me is that if the subpoena nonsense is true PJ must be in
quite a jam. She made it very clear that she doesn't want her private life or
her identity known, and she has all rights to want it thus. But with the respect
she has for the justice system this might be a very nasty dilemma.
I hope it is not the reason for her health break but I surmise otherwise.
I wish her lots of wisdom and hope this idiocy goes away before she has to
choose between a rock and a hard place.
It's a scummy thing to do do a person, but that SCO was scum is no surprise.[ Reply to This | # ]
|
|
Authored by: AndyC on Thursday, February 15 2007 @ 03:54 AM EST |
The question in my mind is this; where has this idea that SCO tried to serve a
supoena on PJ come from?
a) Is it in a court filing?
b) Has it come from the court appointed bailiff (or whoever tried to serve the
supoena on PJ)?
c) Or has it just come from SCO via the press?
I actually don't know, but I suspect c) is about as close to the truth as we are
going to get when dealing with SCO.
Andy
Please feel free to blow this post into nothingness if I've missed something
here...[ Reply to This | # ]
|
|
Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, February 15 2007 @ 04:46 AM EST |
From the mouth itself
http://www.microsoft.com/interop/letters/choice.mspx[ Reply to This | # ]
|
|
Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, February 15 2007 @ 05:49 AM EST |
. [ Reply to This | # ]
|
|
Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, February 15 2007 @ 09:11 AM EST |
Excuse my foriegn language. Does anyone know where there is a mirror of the
transcripts for the Iowa Comes VS Microsoft files? For some stupid reason, I
thought that the public transcripts would remain public. Now you can't get in
unless you are "AUTHORIZED".[ Reply to This | # ]
|
|
Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, February 15 2007 @ 12:32 PM EST |
The Gates deposition is now at the internet archive:
The Gates videotaped deposition at the Internet archive [ Reply to This | # ]
|
|
Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, February 15 2007 @ 07:32 PM EST |
I know, Mathfox, you're over worked, and it is well
appreciated! Thank you! As a suggestion, new major topic
would be appreciated also. It gets tough to separate the
new from the old after 500 or so postings.
Regardless, send a "Thank you, we love and miss you." to PJ.
We all (I assume that is a fact) miss her. Oh, we like
you too. :) Hey, hey, you know what I'm saying.
Thanks.
:)
[ Reply to This | # ]
|
|
|
|
|