decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


You won't find me on Facebook


Donate

Donate Paypal


No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
IBM Makes an Appearance... Represented by One of the Main Authors of the Bankruptcy Code - Bert Young Leaves; Nasdaq News
Friday, September 28 2007 @ 04:29 PM EDT

Of course, it had to happen. IBM makes an appearance [PDF] In the Matter of The SCO Group, et al, Debtors, informing the court that they'd like to be sent all notices by the court. The local attorney in Delaware is Laurie Selber Silverstein, of Potter Anderson & Corroon. But IBM's Cravath lawyer is Richard B. Levin. He was one of the principal authors of the Bankruptcy Code and the Bankruptcy Reform Act of 1978.

: )

I'd say that might just indicate the level of IBM's interest in this bankruptcy.

And I'd guess you might be interested in this press release from SCO, "The SCO Group Announces Ken Nielsen as Interim Financial Officer:" "Mr. Nielsen replaces Bert Young who has left The SCO Group to pursue new opportunities." So, hmm. SCO lost approximately half of the finance department, and now it's buh-bye to Bert. Lands sakes. Would that mean there's no one at SCO who can recall what happened to all that "tainted money" that needs to be traced to ensure Novell gets its money at last? And just when SCO needs these people the most, they up and quit [or get fired]. Just kidding. Bert will be serving SCO as a consultant for the next six months, according to SCO's 8K just filed. SCO has a date with Nasdaq to beg for a stay of execution from delisting on November 8 for non-compliance of Nasdaq Marketplace Rules 4300 and IM-4300 (that's about filing for bankruptcy, according to SCO's 8K). They'll stay listed until a final decision is reached as far as the first notice is concerned. However, today SCO also announced they received another Nasdaq notice about Rule 4310(c)(4), regarding "bid price deficiency".

The bio I link to tells us this about Mr. Levin:

Richard Levin is a partner in the Cravath, Swaine & Moore LLP Restructuring and Insolvency Department. Rich's practice focuses on corporate restructuring, insolvency and bankruptcy issues. He represents financially troubled corporate debtors, acquirers of troubled companies and special creditors in both out-of-court workouts and Chapter 11 reorganizations. Rich has significant experience guiding debtor and non-debtor clients through insolvency restructuring or reorganization, structuring and negotiating complex deals involving insolvent companies and, where necessary, directing litigation in support of the negotiations.

Rich, who served as counsel to a subcommittee of the House Judiciary Committee from 1975 to 1978, was one of the principal authors of the Bankruptcy Code and the Bankruptcy Reform Act of 1978. He serves as Vice Chair of the National Bankruptcy Conference. He is also a member of the Board of Trustees and a Fellow of the American College of Bankruptcy and a member of the faculty of the Federal Judicial Center. Rich received an S.B. from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology in 1972, and a J.D. from Yale Law School in 1975, where he was an Editor of the Yale Law Journal.

He probably will get it right, don't you think? I've seen SCO puffery bragging that one of its attorneys is a retired judge. Pish posh. Judges merely interpret the code to make sure the wording is followed and enforced. Mr. Levin helped to write the code. Here is Judge Kevin Gross's bio, by the way.

There is also a notice [PDF] from Kelly Beaudin Stapleton, United States Trustee:

As of the date of this statement, a committee of unsecured creditors has not been appointed by the UNITED STATES TRUSTEE.

The reason given that no unsecured creditors' committee has been formed is because of "insufficient response to the United States Trustee communications/contact for service on the committeee." Those notices went out to the top 20 creditors, IIRC. So, Microsoft doesn't wish to sit on that committee? No interest in helping out?

I'd suggest we all stay tuned. It's still very early in the process. You'll notice on Notice of Commencement of Chapter 11 Bankruptcy Cases, Meeting of Creditors and Fixing of Certain Dates [PDF] that the date for that meeting is October 18, and it says that a notice of the deadline to file a proof of claim will be sent out later. And on page two, it mentions in the subhead "Commencement of Cases" that certain documents are also available now on SCO's claims agent, Epiq Bankruptcy Solutions. They work for SCO, of course, so I am not sure how that impacts on any privacy concerns you may have. But it's free. Or you can obtain them from the court. Or just follow along with us here. But for anything that matters, you need the documents directly from the court itself.

That same page two explains Chapter 11 to the creditors, and we can learn from it too:

COMMENCEMENT OF CASES. Petitions for reorganization under chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code have been filed in this Court by the Debtors listed above, and orders for relief have been entered. You wil not receive notice of all documents filed in these cases. All documents filed with the Court, including lists of the Debtors' property and debts, are available for inspection at the Office of the Clerk of the Bankruptcy Court. In addition, such documents may be available at www.deb.uscourts.gov. Certain documents are also available on the web site of the Debtors' claims agent, Epiq Bankptcy Solutions, LLC, at http://chapterl1.epiqsystems.com/SCO.

PURPOSE OF CHAPTER 11 FILING. Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code enables a debtor to reorganize and/or liquidate pursuant to a plan. A plan is not effective unless approved by the Court at a confirmation hearing. Creditors will be given notice concerning any plan, or in the event the case is dismissed or converted to another chapter of the Bankruptcy Code. The Debtors will remain in possession of their property and will continue to operate any business unless a trustee is appointed.

CREDITORS MAY NOT TAKE CERTAIN ACTIONS. A creditor is anyone to whom a debtor owes money or property. Under the Bankruptcy Code, a debtor is granted certain protection against creditors. Common examples of prohibited actions by creditors are contacting a debtor to demand repayment, taking action against a debtor to collect money owed to creditors or to take property of a debtor, and starting or continuing foreclosure actions or repossessions. If unauthorized actions are taken by a creditor against a debtor, the Court may penalize that creditor. A creditor who is considering taking action against a debtor or the property of a debtor should review § 362 of the Bankruptcy Code and may wish to seek legal advice. The staff of the Clerk of the Bankrptcy Court are not permitted to give legal advice.

MEETING OF CREDITORS. The Debtors' representative, as specified in Rule 9001(5) of the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure (the "Bankruptcy Rules"), is required to appear at the meeting of creditors on the date and at the place set forth above for the purpose of being examined under oath. Attendance by creditors at the meeting is welcomed, but not required. At the meeting, the creditors may examine the Debtors and transact such other business as may properly come before the meeting. The meeting may be continued or adjourned from time to time by notice at the meeting, without further written notice to the creditors.

CLAIMS. Schedules of creditors will be filed pursuant to Bankruptcy Rule 1007. Any creditor holding a scheduled claim which is not listed as disputed, contingent, or unliquidated as to amount may, but is not required to, file a proof of claim in these cases. Creditors whose claims are not scheduled or whose claims are listed as disputed, contingent, or unliquidated as to amount and who desire to participate in the cases or share in any distrbution must file their proofs of claim. A creditor who desires to rely on the schedule of creditors has the responsibilty for determining that the claim is listed accurately. Separate notice of the deadlines to fie proofs of claim and proof of claim forms wil be provided to the Debtors' known creditors. Proof of claim forms also are available in the clerk's offce of any bankruptcy court. Proof of claim forms are also available from the Court's web site at www.deb.uscours.gov. Epiq Bankruptcy Solutions, LLC is the claims agent in these cases and can provide a proof of claim form if you cannot obtain one from your local bankruptcy court....

The press release from SCO about the new Nasdaq notice reads in pertinent part like this:

The SCO Group, Inc. (the "Company") (Nasdaq: SCOX - News), a leading provider of UNIX® software technology and mobile services, today announced it received a Nasdaq Staff Deficiency Letter on September 25, 2007 indicating that the Company fails to comply with the minimum bid price requirement for continued listing set forth in Marketplace Rule 4310(c)(4). The letter gives the Company notice that the Company's bid price of its common stock has closed under $1.00 for the last 30 business days.

Pursuant to Nasdaq Marketplace Rule 4310(c)(8)(D), the Company has been provided an initial period of 180 calendar days, or until March 24, 2008, to regain compliance. The 180 day period relates exclusively to the bid price deficiency. The Company may be delisted during the 180 day period for failure to maintain compliance with any other listing requirements for which it is currently on notice or which occurs during this period. The letter states the Nasdaq staff will provide written notification that the Company has achieved compliance with Rule 4310(c)(4) if at any time before March 24, 2008, the bid price of the Company's common stock closes at $1.00 per share or more for a minimum of 10 consecutive business days, although the letter also states that the Nasdaq staff has the discretion to require compliance for a period in excess of 10 consecutive business days, but generally no more than 20 consecutive business days, under certain circumstances.

If the Company cannot demonstrate compliance with Rule 4310(c)(4) by March 24, 2008, the Nasdaq staff will determine whether the Company meets The Nasdaq Capital Market initial listing criteria set forth in Nasdaq Marketplace Rule 4310(c), except for the bid price requirement. If the Company meets the initial listing criteria, the Nasdaq staff will notify the Company that it has been granted an additional 180 calendar day compliance period. If the Company is not eligible for an additional compliance period, the Nasdaq staff will provide written notice that the Company's securities will be delisted. At that time, the Company may appeal the Nasdaq staff's determination to delist its securities to a Listing Qualifications Panel.

The Company also has received a hearing date of November 8th, 2007 regarding non-compliance of Nasdaq Marketplace Rules 4300 and IM-4300. As such, the Company's common stock will not be delisted on September 27, 2007 as previously indicated by Nasdaq. Instead, the delisting action has been stayed, pending a final written decision by the Nasdaq Listing Qualifications Panel.

Here are some more docket entries to bring us up to date:

56 - Filed & Entered: 09/21/2007
Terminated: 09/24/2007
Motion to Appear pro hac vice (B)
Docket Text: Motion to Appear pro hac vice of Grace E. Robson. Receipt Number 148983, Filed by The SCO Group, Inc.. (Jones, Laura Davis)

57 - Filed & Entered: 09/24/2007
Order Setting Omnibus Hearing Dates
Docket Text: Order Setting Omnibus Hearing Dates. All hearings will be held at US Bankruptcy Court, 824 Market St., 6th Fl., Courtroom #3, Wilmington, Delaware (Related document(s)[55] ). Omnibus Hearings scheduled for 10/5/2007 at 01:30 PM., 11/6/2007 at 02:00 PM., 12/5/2007 at 10:00 AM., 1/8/2008 at 10:00 AM., 2/5/2008 at 10:00 AM. Signed on 9/21/2007. (LCN, )

58 - Filed & Entered: 09/24/2007
Order on Motion to Appear pro hac vice
Docket Text: Order Granting Motion for Admission pro hac vice of Grace E. Robson. (Related Doc # [56]) Order Signed on 9/24/2007. (LCN, )

59 - Filed & Entered: 09/24/2007
Transcript
Docket Text: Transcript of Hearing held on September 18, 2007 before the Honorable Kevin Gross. (related document(s)[15] ) (BJM)

60 - Filed & Entered: 09/24/2007
Affidavit/Declaration of Service
Docket Text: Affidavit/Declaration of Service (and Service List) Regarding Order Setting Omnibus Hearing Dates (related document(s)[57] ) Filed by The SCO Group, Inc.. (Werkheiser, Rachel)

61 - Filed & Entered: 09/24/2007
Affidavit/Declaration of Service
Docket Text: Affidavit/Declaration of Service (and Service List) Regarding Order Granting Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice of Grace E. Robson (related document(s)[58] ) Filed by The SCO Group, Inc.. (Werkheiser, Rachel)

62 - Filed & Entered: 09/25/2007
Terminated: 09/26/2007
Motion to Appear pro hac vice (B) Docket Text: Motion to Appear pro hac vice - David Melaugh. Receipt Number 149010, Filed by Novell, Inc.. (Nestor, Michael)

63 - Filed & Entered: 09/26/2007
Order on Motion to Appear pro hac vice
Docket Text: Order Granting Motion for Admission pro hac vice of David Melaugh. (Related Doc # [62]) Order Signed on 9/25/2007. (LCN, )

64 - Filed & Entered: 09/26/2007
Notice of Meeting of Creditors/Commencement of Case (B)
Docket Text: Notice of Meeting of Creditors/Commencement of Case Filed by The SCO Group, Inc.. Hearing scheduled for 10/18/2007 at 10:00 AM at US District Court, 844 King St., Room 2112, Wilmington, Delaware. (Werkheiser, Rachel)

65 - Filed & Entered: 09/26/2007
Affidavit/Declaration of Service
Docket Text: Affidavit/Declaration of Service by Epiq Bankruptcy Solutions, LLC, Regarding Notice of Commencement of Chapter 11 Bankruptcy Cases, Meeting of Creditors and Fixing of Certain Dates (related document(s)[64] ) Filed by The SCO Group, Inc.. (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit A) (Werkheiser, Rachel)

66 - Filed & Entered: 09/27/2007
Notice of Appearance(B)
Docket Text: Notice of Appearance Filed by Tarrant County. (Weller, Helen)

67 - Filed & Entered: 09/28/2007
Statement Committee Has Not Been Appointed
Docket Text: Statement That Unsecured Creditors' Committee Has Not Been Appointed Filed by United States Trustee. (McMahon Jr., Joseph)

68 - Filed & Entered: 09/28/2007
Notice of Service
Docket Text: Notice of Service /Request for Service of Papers Filed by IBM Corp.. (Attachments: # (1) Certificate of Service) (Silverstein, Laurie)


  


IBM Makes an Appearance... Represented by One of the Main Authors of the Bankruptcy Code - Bert Young Leaves; Nasdaq News | 328 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
Corrections here
Authored by: Erwan on Friday, September 28 2007 @ 04:41 PM EDT
If any

---
Erwan

[ Reply to This | # ]

OT, the Off topic thread
Authored by: Erwan on Friday, September 28 2007 @ 04:42 PM EDT
Some do not like on-topic comments here ;-)

---
Erwan

[ Reply to This | # ]

Chapter 7?
Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, September 28 2007 @ 04:43 PM EDT
Am I misguided in hoping that this means that SCO will be in Chapter 7 pretty
soon and the entire board will be fired?

Which reminds me, I need to get some party hats for that day...

[ Reply to This | # ]

News Picks discussion here.
Authored by: Erwan on Friday, September 28 2007 @ 04:43 PM EDT
As usual now.

---
Erwan

[ Reply to This | # ]

Financial Statements
Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, September 28 2007 @ 04:44 PM EDT
I think I heared somewhere SCO didn't include Financial Statements with the
bankruptcy filing. Is that so; if yes, is there any news about this?

[ Reply to This | # ]

Hmmmm. Does that mean what I think it means?
Authored by: Ed L. on Friday, September 28 2007 @ 05:05 PM EDT
(Levin) represents financially troubled corporate debtors, acquirers of troubled companies and special creditors in both out-of-court workouts and Chapter 11 reorganizations.
Does that mean IBM finally grants our favorite troublesome company its life-long wish and buys them out?

Does have a certain ring to it, even if its only for wooden nickles on the dollar...

---
"OOXML - Not exactly the best standard money can buy."

[ Reply to This | # ]

Levin FamiIy - IBM Makes an Appearance... Represented by One of the Main Authors of the Bank...
Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, September 28 2007 @ 05:07 PM EDT
Wonder if he is any relation to Carl Levin.

[ Reply to This | # ]

That's not a bankruptcy attorney, THIS is a bankruptcy attorney...
Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, September 28 2007 @ 05:12 PM EDT
apologies to Crocodile Dundee.

Cheers
Mike

[ Reply to This | # ]

MS dosent want to help out.
Authored by: waltish on Friday, September 28 2007 @ 05:18 PM EDT
Of course they don't ... They fear the Gestank of SCO, and so must all the
others, the fact none of them want in is telling.

w

---
M$ is a parasite on the back of corporate America, indeed corporate everywhere,
and the EU have smacked it.

[ Reply to This | # ]

Looks like Bert Young is going to be the scapegoat
Authored by: Carter on Friday, September 28 2007 @ 05:42 PM EDT
Wonder how much they had to offer the new sucker?

Bert Young Replaced

[ Reply to This | # ]

Tarrant County
Authored by: Coonan on Friday, September 28 2007 @ 05:53 PM EDT
Looks like there is more interest from Texas... Talk about a full courtroom...

[ Reply to This | # ]

Will a "Woody Allen Moment" occur at the hearing?
Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, September 28 2007 @ 05:56 PM EDT
[EXCERPT FROM FILM ANNIE HALL PLAYS]

MAN: It's the influence of television. Now, now Marshall McLuhan deals with it
in terms of it being a, a high-- high intensity, you understand? A hot medium--

WOODY ALLEN: What I wouldn't give for a large sock with horse manure in it.

MAN: -- as opposed to the truth which he [sees as the] media or--

WOODY ALLEN: What can you do when you get stuck on a movie line with a guy like
this behind you?

MAN: Now, Marshall McLuhan--

WOODY ALLEN: You don't know anything about Marshall McLuhan's work--

MAN: Really? Really? I happen to teach a class at Columbia called TV, Media and
Culture, so I think that my insights into Mr. McLuhan, well, have a great deal
of validity.

WOODY ALLEN: Oh, do you?

MAN: Yeah.

WOODY ALLEN: Oh, that's funny, because I happen to have Mr. McLuhan right here.
Come over here for a second?

MAN: Oh--

WOODY ALLEN: Tell him.

MARSHALL McLUHAN: -- I heard, I heard what you were saying. You, you know
nothing of my work. How you ever got to teach a course in anything is totally
amazing.

WOODY ALLEN: Boy, if life were only like this.
http://www.onthemedia.org/yore/transcripts/transcripts_041604_mcluhan.html

Well guys we may be about to see if life is really like this!


SCO Lawyer: My learned opponent knows nothing about how the bankruptcy code
should be interperted.

IBM Lawyer: Oh yeah, well I wrote the Bankruptcy code.

SCO Lawyer: Oh



At this point Woody Allen, who has been hired as a consultant on the case, pops
out from behind a potted palm and says...

Woody Allen: Say the Magic Word and Collect $100!

[ Reply to This | # ]

Tainted money
Authored by: baomike on Friday, September 28 2007 @ 06:01 PM EDT
I have seen this term and the idea of tracing to disposition of the
"converted funds". It runs smack into the idea that money is a
"fungible asset". One dollar is no different that the next. The idea
, at least to me , is ludicrous. An account with $100,000 from license sales,
and $100,000 from equipment sales, is used to pay for a new truck ($50,000). You
can slice this anyway you want and no one apportionment has anymore validity
than any other.

I must be missing something.

[ Reply to This | # ]

Was money for a new CFO approved by the court?
Authored by: bezz on Friday, September 28 2007 @ 07:02 PM EDT
SCO, at the hearing, stated it needed to spend money on hiring Accountemps temps
to get out the 10-K (Annual Report) and specifically stated they were not
spending money on a new CFO.

Am I missing something? Did they really announce a new CFO AND paying the old
one as a consultant for six months? And they could not wait for the next
hearing on October 2 to request approval of the court?

I sure hope Novell has something to say about this sorry situation. SCO is
spending money without approval contrary to what they already told the court and
now they've lost most of the people responsible for tracing Novell's money they
claim was already spent. Should be a hoot and wakeup call for the judge.

[ Reply to This | # ]

IBM Makes an Appearance... Represented by One of the Main Authors of the Bankruptcy Code - Bert
Authored by: bilateralrope on Friday, September 28 2007 @ 07:32 PM EDT
>>But IBM's Cravath lawyer is Richard B. Levin. He was one of the
principal authors of the Bankruptcy Code and the Bankruptcy Reform Act of 1978.

And here I thought that Novell's team of lawyers sounded impressive.

[ Reply to This | # ]

IBM Makes an Appearance... And so will I
Authored by: john-from-ct on Friday, September 28 2007 @ 07:34 PM EDT
Hi All,

I'll be in attendance on the 5th, but I won't be taking it! :)



---
Just another greybeard geek!

[ Reply to This | # ]

Insufficient response
Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, September 28 2007 @ 07:45 PM EDT
Hmmmm... I wonder if that's related to "lack of specificity"...

[ Reply to This | # ]

Pish posh?
Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, September 28 2007 @ 08:35 PM EDT
Pish posh. Judges merely interpret the code to make sure the wording is followed and enforced. Mr. Levin helped to write the code.

Uh, judges decide about the meaning of laws. The authors may be the ones to ask about the original intent, but when the words are not a crystal clear representation of the intent, the judges are the ones that interpret the laws once they have been passed.

[ Reply to This | # ]

... a leading provider of UNIX® software technology and mobile services... (chuckle:)
Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, September 28 2007 @ 09:37 PM EDT
Who are they kidding?

:)

[ Reply to This | # ]

Fire & Rehire == Bankruptcy scam?
Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, September 28 2007 @ 11:06 PM EDT
I heard somewhere that firing people and then having your lawyers rehire them
(so that your communication with them becomes attorney-client privilege) was a
common bankruptcy scam to pull? Oh, sorry, guess that should be
"ploy" instead of "scam" but it's hard to understand why it
would be necessary unless there's something to hide...

So I guess there's a question: did the lawyers hire this guy back as a
consultant or did SCO? Because that would be kinda interesting...

[ Reply to This | # ]

I've a question
Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, September 28 2007 @ 11:14 PM EDT
Would it not be in the best interest of Free Software that Novell lose all of
it's cases so the IBM case can come fully to fruition? It looks like IBM has an
all but iron clad case, but if Novell wins, then this test of the GPL will not
be nearly as significant.
Am I wrong?

[ Reply to This | # ]

SCOG files for stay of arbitration
Authored by: Anonymous on Saturday, September 29 2007 @ 01:36 AM EDT
http://chapter11.epiqsystems.com/
clientdefault.aspx?pk=8ce798da-b105-4a4c-808a-b1214f0ea6d5&l=1

goto: "docket"

[ Reply to This | # ]

Hey, wait a minute!
Authored by: Ian Al on Saturday, September 29 2007 @ 03:20 AM EDT
JUDGE GROSS: OK, Novell you have sent five top bankruptcy lawyers and, looking
at the note from Darl, you are owed less than $5000, is that right?

NOVELL: Yes, your honour.

JUDGE GROSS: IBM, you have sent one of the primary authors of the bankruptcy
code that rules this court and you are owed, let me see Darl's note again, yes
less that $5000, is that right?

IBM: Yes, your honour.

JUDGE GROSS: And the top twenty creditors don't want anything to do with the
creditors' committee, is that right?

TRUSTEE: Yes, your honour.

JUDGE GROSS: Will somebody tell me what the blue blazes is going on, here?


---
Regards
Ian Al

Linux: Genuine Advantage

[ Reply to This | # ]

Question about "tracing tainted money"
Authored by: Anonymous on Saturday, September 29 2007 @ 03:12 PM EDT
I've been following he discussions here for the last weeks and read that tracing
tainted money is used to determine if any profits belong to the creditor. Does
that mean the following scenario is valid?

A) The appeals court rules that SCO has the UNIX copyrights but still broke the
APA and therefore converted Novell's money with the M$ and Sun deals.
B) SCO used that money to pay lawyers in the IBM case.
C) SCO wins the IBM case and gets granted $700,000,000.
D) Novell receives 80% of that sum because it was gained using their converted
money (assuming that Novell's righful share of the M$ and Sun money was 80% of
SCO's revenue in that year.)

I know that C) is most unlikely :-)

/Andreas

[ Reply to This | # ]

*Where* is the tainted money?
Authored by: ghynes on Sunday, September 30 2007 @ 09:32 PM EDT
All things considered, the Vultus acquisition (covered here at Groklaw in great
detail) should now be considered in a new light.

At first, it looked like the "off-the-shelf" enrichment of the
officers of the companies involved.

With Darl McBride telling the BK court that SCOX ME (ME Inc.) is the road out of
Chapter 11 proceedings as a "going concern", perhaps Novell's lawyers
should bring that particular business transaction into the light that it truly
deserves.

How delicious..... Novell's money being "converted" into SCOX.PK
zombie "re-animation" .....

You can't write this stuff .... seriously. ;-)

[ Reply to This | # ]

Judge Gross' Bio
Authored by: The Cornishman on Monday, October 01 2007 @ 08:41 AM EDT
I had a quick look at the very limited biographical notes at the link that PJ
gave. Judge Gross was admitted to both the Pennsylvania and Delaware bars in
1978, and was named New Lawyer of Year, 1988, by the Delaware Bar Association.

Unless that's a typo, lawyers stay fresh for a long time in Delaware!



---
(c) assigned to PJ

[ Reply to This | # ]

IBM Makes an Appearance... Represented by One of the Main Authors of the Bankruptcy Code - Bert Young Leaves; Nasdaq News
Authored by: 34CFR20USC on Monday, October 01 2007 @ 10:27 AM EDT
Dang... With IBM signed up with Levin, the 341 meeting should be interesting.

Anyone going? It's on October 18 at 10am (UTC-5).

Makes me wish I live in Delaware...

---
I am not an attorney. I'm just a lowly researcher who is a law groupie. I
don't offer advice, but I ask a lot of questions.

[ Reply to This | # ]

IBM Makes an Appearance... Represented by One of the Main Authors of the Bankruptcy Code - Bert Young Leaves; Nasdaq News
Authored by: 34CFR20USC on Monday, October 01 2007 @ 10:31 AM EDT

The commenter deleted his comment

[ Reply to This | # ]

Truth in Advertising...
Authored by: BassSinger on Monday, October 01 2007 @ 11:53 AM EDT

In SCO's press release:

"...a leading provider of UNIX® software technology and mobile services..."

It occurs to me that:

"...a leading provider of fruitless, fallacious and frivolous litigation..."

would be more accurate.

Tom

"We cannot solve our problems with the same thinking we used when we created them."
-- Albert Einstein

[ Reply to This | # ]

Legal Question
Authored by: BassSinger on Monday, October 01 2007 @ 12:28 PM EDT

PJ,

Since one of the purposes of Groklaw is to explain the law, could you or some attourney please address the issue of communications between the judges?

Specifically, are there any restrictions (either legal or by convention) on Judge Kimball bringing Judge Gross up to speed on SCO's background in litigation?

Tom

"We cannot solve our problems with the same thinking we used when we created them."
-- Albert Einstein

[ Reply to This | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )