|
What's on the Agenda for the Hearings on November 6 and 16 |
|
Sunday, November 04 2007 @ 09:01 PM EST
|
There have been some last-minute changes so I thought it'd be good to update our agendas for the hearings on Tuesday, November 6 and November 16 so you will know when to show up for the hearing that interests you. As you know, SCO's "Please Can We Sell All Our Assets -- and Novell's and IBM's Too! -- So They Can't Get A Dime and We Can Litigate Ever Onward" motion will have its own hearing on November 16, beginning at 4 PM, because both IBM and Novell objected. Technically, SCO calls it Emergency Motion of the Debtors for An Order (A) Approving Asset Purchase Agreement, (B) Establishing Sale and Bidding Procedures, and (C) Approving the Form and Manner of Notice of Sale.
Remember the time change too. The hearing on November 6 now begins at 10 AM Eastern Time. You can read the agenda in the PDF, but I've put the various motions into categories to make it a little easier. The links are all PDFs, but you can find links to articles about each document or text when we have them on Groklaw's Bankruptcy Timeline page, which Erwan is working to make even easier to navigate. He wrote a script so you can leap from the numbered document listed for each hearing straight to the document in the docket list and if you see a bracketed number referencing an earlier filing in the center column of text, like a response to a motion, you can click on the bracketed number and leap to the motion it refers to. I'm having fun playing with our new bankruptcy bouncing ball. More to come.
Here are the motions that will be heard on Tuesday, November 6:
Here are the motions that are continued and will be heard another day: A couple of uncontested matters were partially resolved or almost resolved, so they may or may not need a hearing and a revised order will be offered at the hearing on November 6, but if they do need a hearing, it won't be on November 6: - Application to Employ Dorsey & Whitney, LLP as Special Counsel to the Debtors. There's a note that indicates that the US Trustee has issues: "The Debtors, Dorsey & Whitney, LLP, and the Office of the United States Trustee ("UST") are attempting to resolve the UST's informal response to this Application. If a resolution can be reached, the Debtors will present a revised proposed form of order at the hearing, or if after the hearing, under certification of counsel. To the extent that a resolution cannot be reached, the parties request that this matter be continued to the hearing scheduled on December 5, 2007 at 10:00 a. m. prevailing Eastern time.
- Debtors' Motion for Approval of Employment of CFO Solutions to Furnish Chief Financial Officer to the Debtors. Again, there is a note indicating the US Trustee has some issues: "The Debtors and the Office of the United States Trustee ("UST") are attempting to resolve the UST's informal response to this Motion. If a resolution can be reached, the Debtors will present a revised proposed form of order at the hearing, or if after the hearing, under certification of counsel. To the extent that a resolution cannot be reached, the parties request that this matter be continued to the hearing scheduled on November 16, 2007 at 4:00 p.m. prevailing Eastern time.
So that's the schedule and the agenda for the two hearings as of this moment. All of this could change still. Bankruptcy Court is a blast. So call first.
|
|
Authored by: Anonymous on Sunday, November 04 2007 @ 09:15 PM EST |
I know, responding to last entry. I had a thought. What about BSD code in
SCO's Unix offerings? I know some evidence was found that suggested there was
some BSD code there that was missing some copyright notices. I am curious if an
entity could represent, I guess Berkley, and at least make SCO include proper
notices before selling these "assets".[ Reply to This | # ]
|
|
Authored by: achurch on Sunday, November 04 2007 @ 09:26 PM EST |
With the correction in the title, please. [ Reply to This | # ]
|
|
Authored by: achurch on Sunday, November 04 2007 @ 09:28 PM EST |
With clickable links, just like the nice red text says. [ Reply to This | # ]
|
- Uncle Sam wants your email... without warrant ! - Authored by: Anonymous on Sunday, November 04 2007 @ 11:10 PM EST
- Fake Steve Jobs takes Groklaw's name in vain - Authored by: Anonymous on Monday, November 05 2007 @ 05:25 AM EST
- Can you be more stupid than the BBC? - Authored by: RTH on Monday, November 05 2007 @ 07:40 AM EST
- I Wonder How Many Schools "Teach" About USA Versus Microsoft - Authored by: Anonymous on Monday, November 05 2007 @ 08:32 AM EST
- Lawyers under attack - Authored by: SpaceLifeForm on Monday, November 05 2007 @ 10:06 AM EST
- Well, gee... - Authored by: Anonymous on Monday, November 05 2007 @ 05:38 PM EST
- Themes ... are they available under GPL? - Authored by: tinkerghost on Monday, November 05 2007 @ 10:21 AM EST
- New stuff on the SCO bankruptcy docket - Authored by: Anonymous on Monday, November 05 2007 @ 11:01 AM EST
- Open Formats - Promoting Innovation - Authored by: Anonymous on Monday, November 05 2007 @ 01:53 PM EST
- SCO bankruptcy docket: #186..187 - Authored by: Anonymous on Monday, November 05 2007 @ 03:49 PM EST
- The item I most want to see on the agenda... - Authored by: Anonymous on Monday, November 05 2007 @ 04:07 PM EST
- SCO bankruptcy docket: #188 - Authored by: Anonymous on Monday, November 05 2007 @ 04:43 PM EST
- Canadian ISP admits to throttling P2P - Authored by: Anonymous on Monday, November 05 2007 @ 06:24 PM EST
|
Authored by: achurch on Sunday, November 04 2007 @ 09:29 PM EST |
Wow, three for three! My first useful contribution to Groklaw. (: [ Reply to This | # ]
|
|
Authored by: bezz on Sunday, November 04 2007 @ 09:47 PM EST |
Thanks, PJ. It's hard to keep up with the agenda and there is a lot to review
before being able to take competent notes. There is a lot to read and review
before November 6.[ Reply to This | # ]
|
|
Authored by: spambait42c on Sunday, November 04 2007 @ 09:59 PM EST |
I'm going to miss all the fun; I'm working the Election November 6th, and am
strictly prohibited from having my laptop with me while so doing, so I won't be
able to keep up with the thrills and chills.
And I'll be spending so much of Wednesday catching up, it'll be 'old news'
before I can get back here to check in.
Oh, well, such are the costs of good citizenship...[ Reply to This | # ]
|
|
Authored by: RFD on Sunday, November 04 2007 @ 10:28 PM EST |
Based on what has happened before prior hearings, once discussions with the US
Trustee are finished, there will probably be a revised agenda filed tomorrow.
I hope to see some of you there Tuesday.
---
Eschew obfuscation assiduously.[ Reply to This | # ]
|
- Probably not - Authored by: Anonymous on Monday, November 05 2007 @ 09:08 AM EST
- Really? - Authored by: Anonymous on Monday, November 05 2007 @ 11:32 AM EST
|
Authored by: DodgeRules on Sunday, November 04 2007 @ 11:19 PM EST |
Motion to File Under Seal (B) Exhibits to Affidavit of Felix Imendoerffer -
this is unopposed, but it relates to SUSE's special opposition, so it's a matter
that, as the agenda puts it, "goes forward".
We should have opposed
it because we are nosey and want to see. ;-)[ Reply to This | # ]
|
|
Authored by: The Mad Hatter r on Monday, November 05 2007 @ 06:59 AM EST |
I think the next two court dates will be important.
---
Wayne
http://sourceforge.net/projects/twgs-toolkit/
[ Reply to This | # ]
|
|
Authored by: Anonymous on Monday, November 05 2007 @ 07:41 AM EST |
What discovery do they need? It seems to me that all there is to prove is that
the UTAH case exists and is close to finishing. It strikes me a conversation
between a couple of clerks could settle that. Maybe that is what we will see in
the name of Judicial Economy. One can hope. ;-) [ Reply to This | # ]
|
|
Authored by: dodger on Monday, November 05 2007 @ 08:09 AM EST |
There's an article saying the the Exxon Valdes Oil spill is 18 years old; Exxon
lost a 2.5 Billion judgment; and they still haven't paid. The legal system is
broken. y'a think?
The article can be found
here
[ Reply to This | # ]
|
|
Authored by: Anonymous on Monday, November 05 2007 @ 09:48 AM EST |
Doesn't he post to groklaw regularly? Did he file the motion based upon the one
share of SCO stock that he's holding?[ Reply to This | # ]
|
- Story on Al Petrofsky? - Authored by: jbeadle on Monday, November 05 2007 @ 10:14 AM EST
- Story on Al Petrofsky? - Authored by: PJ on Monday, November 05 2007 @ 10:34 AM EST
- Story on Al Petrofsky? - Authored by: Anonymous on Monday, November 05 2007 @ 10:40 AM EST
- Story on Al Petrofsky? - Authored by: Anonymous on Monday, November 05 2007 @ 10:48 AM EST
- Story on Al Petrofsky? - Authored by: PJ on Monday, November 05 2007 @ 10:59 AM EST
- Story on Al Petrofsky? - Authored by: Anonymous on Monday, November 05 2007 @ 11:29 AM EST
- Tor - Authored by: Anonymous on Monday, November 05 2007 @ 12:01 PM EST
- Mercy... - Authored by: Anonymous on Monday, November 05 2007 @ 12:44 PM EST
- Story on Al Petrofsky? - Authored by: Anonymous on Monday, November 05 2007 @ 01:11 PM EST
- Story on Al Petrofsky? - Authored by: ak on Monday, November 05 2007 @ 02:23 PM EST
- Story on Al Petrofsky? - Authored by: Anonymous on Monday, November 05 2007 @ 02:36 PM EST
- Confirmed - Authored by: ak on Tuesday, November 06 2007 @ 03:36 AM EST
- Confirmed? - Authored by: Anonymous on Tuesday, November 06 2007 @ 10:12 AM EST
- "subpeona deus tecum" - Authored by: Anonymous on Monday, November 05 2007 @ 04:34 PM EST
|
Authored by: rfrazier on Monday, November 05 2007 @ 11:04 AM EST |
We could have a ruling from the bench in the Bankruptcy Court, the Novell/SCO
trial, and a decision there, all prior to the Nov. 16 hearing. That would be
entertaining.
Best wishes,
Bob
[ Reply to This | # ]
|
|
Authored by: rkhalloran on Monday, November 05 2007 @ 12:02 PM EST |
No word here or on the Usual Boards as of 12N ET; any idea how soon we'll hear
about what went on?
SCOX DELENDA EST!![ Reply to This | # ]
|
|
Authored by: rsmith on Monday, November 05 2007 @ 12:12 PM EST |
A lot of the links to motions contain the letters "(B)" in places that
don't match the PDFs. Why?
---
Intellectual Property is an oxymoron.[ Reply to This | # ]
|
|
Authored by: Anonymous on Tuesday, November 06 2007 @ 04:03 AM EST |
Is it UTC-5? [ Reply to This | # ]
|
|
|
|
|