|
|
| Oracle v. Google Timeline |
 |
|
Sunday, August 22 2010 @ 10:57 AM EDT
|
We have a new Timeline page where you will be able to find all the filed documents in the Oracle America, Inc. v. Google, Inc. litigation. The complaint and other administrative filings are there now, and when Google files an answer, you'll find it there. So if you read something in the media about the case, you can always verify the facts right here in the filings themselves. We've added a link to the new page in the standard menu. We also have set up a new topic, so if you are a member and you read Groklaw by topic, look for OraclevGoogle.
|
|
|
|
| Authored by: Anonymous on Sunday, August 22 2010 @ 11:23 AM EDT |
| I thought Google 's Java was not under the GPL. [ Reply to This | # ]
|
| |
| Authored by: Anonymous on Sunday, August 22 2010 @ 12:20 PM EDT |
| The question is: Is Dalvik in all relevant respects equivalent to JVM?
In a
way, yes because Android apps are written in the Java(TM) language, and compiled
by javac compiler resulting into java bytecode. These files are then converted
into Android's .dex.
On the other hand, no, because there is no Java in
Dalvik at all and nor will Dalvik run Java bytecode.
I must mention I am on
Google's side so we should dig through all prior art and rid the "community" of
this software patent mayhem.
There is good work on this Oracle vs Google
patent suit
over here .
[ Reply to This | # ]
|
| |
| Authored by: Aladdin Sane on Sunday, August 22 2010 @ 12:23 PM EDT |
| Well, if there are any corrections, place them here.
---
There is
nothing unknowable—only that which is yet to be known. —The Fourth
Doctor (Tom Baker) [ Reply to This | # ]
|
| |
| Authored by: Aladdin Sane on Sunday, August 22 2010 @ 12:25 PM EDT |
| Comment on Groklaw News Picks here. Be sure to name the News
Pick.
---
There is nothing unknowable—only that which is yet to
be known. —The Fourth Doctor (Tom Baker) [ Reply to This | # ]
|
| |
| Authored by: Aladdin Sane on Sunday, August 22 2010 @ 12:27 PM EDT |
| Thread any off topic conversation under this comment.
---
There is
nothing unknowable—only that which is yet to be known. —The Fourth
Doctor (Tom Baker) [ Reply to This | # ]
|
| |
| Authored by: Aladdin Sane on Sunday, August 22 2010 @ 12:29 PM EDT |
| Place transcriptions of Comes v. MS documents in this
thread.
---
There is nothing unknowable—only that which is yet
to be known. —The Fourth Doctor (Tom Baker) [ Reply to This | # ]
|
| |
| Authored by: Anonymous on Monday, August 23 2010 @ 09:58 AM EDT |
Here is a article the examines why Oracle is right to sue Google.
Why Oracle was right to sue Google
http://www.infoworld.com/d/developer-world/why-oracle-was-right-sue-google-392-1
?page=0,0
I'm on Java's side here not Oracle's or Google's. Google, like Microsoft before
them, is trying to use Java to their own ends. Google cares not for the use of
Java and in fact is trying to fragment Java and steer developers away from Java.
For that I say shame on you Google.
If Google were honest they would have said we aren't planning on using Java but
rather, plan using their own proprietary code and plan on using Google Go for
their API.
Oracle is just out for the money and trying to protect an asset that is a
revenue stream. Not criminal but not noble either. The positive outcome is
Oracle taking a leadership role for Java and leading it forward, preventing
fragmentation.[ Reply to This | # ]
|
| |
| Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, September 02 2010 @ 08:58 AM EDT |
A webinar entitled Will Oracle's Java Patents Take Down Google's Android
Platform is scheduled for Wednesday, September 8th. See
www.sunlightresearch.com for more details.
Thanks.[ Reply to This | # ]
|
|
|
|
|
