|
| Authored by: Kilz on Wednesday, December 14 2011 @ 04:58 PM EST |
| For all posts that are not on topic. [ Reply to This | # ]
|
|
|
| Authored by: Kilz on Wednesday, December 14 2011 @ 04:59 PM EST |
| Please mention the name of the story in the title of your post. [ Reply to This | # ]
|
|
|
| Authored by: Kilz on Wednesday, December 14 2011 @ 05:00 PM EST |
| While I don't think we will find any, its possible. [ Reply to This | # ]
|
|
|
| Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, December 14 2011 @ 05:03 PM EST |
Keep recycling the case until there are no eligible judges to hear it.
I.E. delay.
Nothing has changed.[ Reply to This | # ]
|
- A LOT has changed - Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, December 14 2011 @ 05:54 PM EST
- This is the plan - Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, December 15 2011 @ 04:28 AM EST
|
|
| Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, December 14 2011 @ 05:03 PM EST |
Is this the Federal Court's way of telling the Delaware bankruptcy court that
it's not going to hear this turkey? And therefore that the BK court needs to
pull the plug on SCO, because it's not going to get a ruling that gives it
money, ever?
MSS2[ Reply to This | # ]
|
|
|
| Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, December 14 2011 @ 05:25 PM EST |
| A man who knows who's naughty and who's nice. [ Reply to This | # ]
|
|
|
| Authored by: Laomedon on Wednesday, December 14 2011 @ 05:36 PM EST |
Maybe Judge J. Frederick Motz wouldn't mind visiting Utah a few more
times...
/tongue in cheek[ Reply to This | # ]
|
|
|
| Authored by: egan on Wednesday, December 14 2011 @ 05:41 PM EST |
Sure, he presided over the second SCO v. Novell trial and ruled against SCO on
the matter of law issues, but he also made sure that SCO had every opportunity
to argue its case.
So if Dee Benson also recuses himself, Ted Stewart will do.
[ Reply to This | # ]
|
|
|
| Authored by: BJ on Wednesday, December 14 2011 @ 06:03 PM EST |
I see the words SCO, JUDGE, RECUSE and DIE in carousselling strings in front of
me.
And I hear funny voices.
And I'd swear I smell bacon...
bjd
[ Reply to This | # ]
|
|
|
| Authored by: crs17 on Wednesday, December 14 2011 @ 11:20 PM EST |
Or any of the other TV judges. Wouldn't it be a hoot if she resolve the case in
10 minutes, just in time for the commercial break?
[ Reply to This | # ]
|
|
|
| Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, December 15 2011 @ 12:49 AM EST |
I guess being a living being person isn't so bad after all. This lingering death
thing for the likes of SCO warms my heart. There should be a word for taking
pleasure in the misfortune of corporations.[ Reply to This | # ]
|
|
|
| Authored by: YetAnotherSteve on Thursday, December 15 2011 @ 05:31 AM EST |
Could this go back to Judge Kimball?
After the successful appeal in SCO v. Novell, I think the trial and final
rulings had to have a different judge, otherwise there would be obvious doubt
about whether the ruling was prejudged.
But now that Judge Kimball's judgement has been weighed against the jury verdict
and Judge Stewart's rulings, why shouldn't SCO v. IBM go back to him?[ Reply to This | # ]
|
|
|
| Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, December 15 2011 @ 07:45 AM EST |
The way this punch and judy show is playing out, I thoroughly expect him to
invite Brent to sit at the bench with him as "you get a better view from up
here" etc[ Reply to This | # ]
|
|
|
| Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, December 15 2011 @ 09:31 AM EST |
Ok that made me laugh.
Cypher3c[ Reply to This | # ]
|
|
|
| Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, December 15 2011 @ 12:06 PM EST |
Why is it not required that the Judge state the reason for the recusal?
How do we know that the reason is not "because I don't feel like it"
(which by the way, is probably a valid reason in this case, but that's besides
the point)?[ Reply to This | # ]
|
- Reasons for recusal? - Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, December 16 2011 @ 04:28 PM EST
- Judges recusal - Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, December 16 2011 @ 09:08 PM EST
|
|
| Authored by: YurtGuppy on Thursday, December 15 2011 @ 01:09 PM EST |
(and I ran, I ran so far away)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0_Pq0xYr3L4
---
a small fish in an even smaller pond[ Reply to This | # ]
|
|
|
| Authored by: SirHumphrey on Thursday, December 15 2011 @ 05:31 PM EST |
| [ Reply to This | # ]
|
- More like... - Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, December 15 2011 @ 09:50 PM EST
|
