decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


You won't find me on Facebook


Donate

Donate Paypal


No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
LinuxTag Wins Concession from SCO Germany
Wednesday, June 25 2003 @ 02:30 PM EDT

Heise.de is reporting, in German, naturally, that SCO has filed a court document essentially agreeing not to repeat any more FUD in Germany against Linux. Here's an English computer-"translation" by Sherlock:

"SCO adds itself warning by LinuxTag

"The LinuxTag is present now an omission assertion of SCO Germany. Therein the enterprise commits itself to state in the future not further of Linux operating systems contained illegitimately acquired mental property of SCO Unix. The SCO Group will also not continue to state, final users could be made liable for the use of Linux or would have prosecution to fear as well as Linux are an not authorized derivative of Unix. During offence become a contractual penalty of 10.000 euro due.

"Against SCO several warnings are present. The association LinuxTag was selected of SCO as a recipient of the omission assertion, since this had expressed a warning as one first and a representative selection of the Linux users represents the members. The warning should force SCO to submit proofs for the alleged law breakings or take the statements back.

"Johannes Loxen of the German Linux federation regards the omission assertion as a partial success for the Linux municipality, since now the Vorverurteilung of the Linux users is from the desk. Now enterprises, which sent warnings away, check as the SerNet GmbH, whether the omission assertion is sufficient representatively of all warnings."


  


LinuxTag Wins Concession from SCO Germany | 1 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
radiocomment
Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, August 14 2003 @ 10:49 AM EDT
Great Site, please keep up the good work. Here's a human-translation of said text. LinuxTag has received a declaration of forbearance from SCO Germany. In the declaration, SCO Germany has agreed to no longer claim that Linux operating systems contain illegally obtained IP of SCO Unix. The SCO group will also no longer claim that end users could be made liable for the usage of linux or expect to face legal proceedings; further, the declaration states that SCO Germany will no longer claim that Linux is an unauthorized derivative of Unix. Should an infringement of this declaration take place, a penalty for breach of contract in the value of 10000€ will be imposed.

SCO has received several warnings. LinuxTag was chosen by SCO as the recipient of the declaration of forbearance, as this was one of the first groups to issue a dissuasion and because the members are a representative group of Linux users. The warning is intended to oblige SCO to provide proof for the alledged IP infringements or refrain from making further claims.

Johannes Loxen from the German "Linux-Verband" sees the declaration as partial success for the linux community in that the pre-judgment of linux users has been swept from the table. Now other companies who also issued warnings, e.g. SerNet GmbH, are examining whether all warnings are covered by the declaration, according to Loxen who spoke to heise online.


Damo Dot

[ Reply to This | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )